We define a new decidable logic for expressing and checking invariants of programs that manipulate dynamically-allocated objects via pointers and destructive pointer updates. The main feature of this logic is the ability to limit the neighborhood of a node that is reachable via a regular expression from a designated node. The logic is closed under boolean operations (entailment, negation) and has a finite model property. The key technical result is the proof of decidability. We show how to express precondition, postconditions, and loop invariants for some interesting programs. It is also possible to express properties such as disjointness of data-structures, and low-level heap mutations. Moreover, our logic can express properties of arbitrary data-structures and of an arbitrary number of pointer fields. The latter provides a way to naturally specify postconditions that relate the fields on entry to a procedure to the fields on exit. Therefore, it is possible to use the logic to automatically prove partial correctness of programs performing low-level heap mutations.
Automatic exploit generation is a relatively new area of research. Work in this area aims to automate the manual and labor intensive task of finding exploits in software. In this paper we present a novel program logic to support automatic exploit generation. We develop a program logic called Reachability Logic, which formally defines the relation between reachability of an assertion and the preconditions which allow them to occur. This relation is then used to calculate the search space of preconditions. We show that Reachability Logic is a powerful tool in automatically finding evidence that …
Recursively defined linked data structures embedded in a pointer-based heap and their properties are naturally expressed in pure first-order logic with least fixpoint definitions (FO+lfp) with background theories. Such logics, unlike pure first-order logic, do not admit even complete procedures. In this paper, we undertake a novel approach for synthesizing inductive hypotheses to prove validity in this logic. The idea is to utilize several kinds of finite first-order models as counterexamples that capture the non-provability and invalidity of formulas to guide the search for inductive hypothes…
We consider parameterized concurrent systems consisting of a finite but unknown number of components, obtained by replicating a given set of finite state automata. Components communicate by executing atomic interactions whose participants update their states simultaneously. We introduce an interaction logic to specify both the type of interactions (e.g.\ rendez-vous, broadcast) and the topology of the system (e.g.\ pipeline, ring). The logic can be easily embedded in monadic second order logic of finitely many successors, and is therefore decidable. Proving safety properties of such a paramete…
We present a tool for verification of deterministic programs with shared mutable references against specifications such as assertions, preconditions, postconditions, and read/write effects. We implement our tool by encoding programs with mutable references into annotated purely functional recursive programs. We then rely on function unfolding and the SMT solver Z3 to prove or disprove safety and to establish program termination. Our tool uses a new translation of programs where frame conditions are encoded using quantifier-free formulas in first-order logic (instead of relying on quantifiers o…
Dedicated to Tony Hoare. In a paper published in 1972 Hoare articulated the fundamental notions of hiding invariants and simulations. Hiding: invariants on encapsulated data representations need not be mentioned in specifications that comprise the API of a module. Simulation: correctness of a new data representation and implementation can be established by proving simulation between the old and new implementations using a coupling relation defined on the encapsulated state. These results were formalized semantically and for a simple model of state, though the paper claimed this could be extend…
How Expressive Are Graph Neural Networks in the Presence of Node Identifiers?
Institute for Logic Language and Computation（逻辑语言与计算研究所）；University of Amsterdam（阿姆斯特丹大学）；Department of Computer Science（计算机科学系）；University of Oxford（牛津大学）；Lehrstuhl Informatik 7（信息学7系）；RWTH Aachen University（亚琛工业大学）
