arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新

科学与医疗

医学 AI

医学智能、临床 AI、医学影像、病理、诊断和医疗健康大模型。

今日/当前日期收录 1 信号源:cs.CV, cs.LG, q-bio, eess.IV, eess.SP
2605.10840 2026-06-18 cs.LG cs.AI q-bio.QM 版本更新 85%

Clin-JEPA: A Multi-Phase Co-Training Framework for Joint-Embedding Predictive Pretraining on EHR Patient Trajectories

Clin-JEPA:一种多阶段协同训练框架,用于EHR患者轨迹的联合嵌入预测预训练

Yixuan Yang, Mehak Arora, Ryan Zhang, Baraa Abed, Junseob Kim, Tilendra Choudhary, Md Hassanuzzaman, Kevin Zhu, Ayman Ali, Chengkun Yang, Alasdair Edward Gent, Victor Moas, Rishikesan Kamaleswaran

发表机构 * Duke University(杜克大学)

专题命中 临床大模型 :提出Clin-JEPA框架,用于EHR患者轨迹预训练。

AI总结 本文提出Clin-JEPA框架,通过多阶段预训练稳定协同训练编码器和预测器,解决EHR数据中联合嵌入预测的挑战,实现多任务下游任务的高性能表现。

Comments 16 pages, 4 figures, 8 tables. Code: https://github.com/YeungYathin/Clin-JEPA

详情
AI中文摘要

我们介绍了Clin-JEPA,一种用于EHR患者轨迹的联合嵌入预测(JEPA)预训练的多阶段协同训练框架。JEPA架构已在机器人领域实现了潜在空间规划,并在视觉领域实现了高质量的表示学习,但将其扩展到EHR数据以获得一个能够同时预测患者轨迹并服务于多种下游风险预测任务的单一主干,仍是一个开放性挑战。现有的JEPA框架要么在预训练后丢弃预测器(I-JEPA,V-JEPA),要么在冻结的预训练编码器上训练预测器(V-JEPA 2-AC),导致编码器在推理时无法感知预测器必须使用的滚动信号;在共享JEPA预测目标下协同训练编码器和预测器将提供这种基础,但朴素的协同训练不稳定,代表性崩溃和在线/目标漂移导致自回归滚动发散。Clin-JEPA的五阶段预训练课程——预测器预热、联合细化、EMA目标对齐、硬同步和预测器最终化——通过阶段解决每个失败模式,稳定地协同训练基于Qwen3-8B的编码器和一个具有9200万参数的潜在轨迹预测器。在MIMIC-IV ICU数据上,三个独立评估支持该框架:(1)潜在ℓ1滚动漂移唯一收敛(-15.7%)在48小时范围内,而基线和消融测试发散(+3%至+4951%);(2)编码器学习了临床可区分的潜在几何结构(衰变患者群体在潜在空间中偏离4.83×,而稳定患者仅偏离≤2.62×);(3)单一主干在多任务下游评估中优于强大的表格和序列基线。Clin-JEPA在ICareFM EEP上达到平均AUROC 0.851,在8个二元风险任务上达到0.883(比基线平均高0.038和0.041)

英文摘要

We present Clin-JEPA, a multi-phase co-training framework for joint-embedding predictive (JEPA) pretraining on EHR patient trajectories. JEPA architectures have enabled latent-space planning in robotics and high-quality representation learning in vision, but extending the paradigm to EHR data -- to obtain a single backbone that simultaneously forecasts patient trajectories and serves diverse downstream risk-prediction tasks without per-task fine-tuning -- remains an open challenge. Existing JEPA frameworks either discard the predictor after pretraining (I-JEPA, V-JEPA) or train it on a frozen pretrained encoder (V-JEPA 2-AC), leaving the encoder unaware of the rollout signal that the retained predictor must use at inference; co-training the encoder and predictor under a shared JEPA prediction objective would supply this grounding, but naïve co-training is unstable, with representation collapse and online/target drift causing autoregressive rollout to diverge. Clin-JEPA's five-phase pretraining curriculum -- predictor warmup, joint refinement, EMA target alignment, hard sync, and predictor finalization -- addresses each failure mode by phase, stably co-training a Qwen3-8B-based encoder and a 92M-parameter latent trajectory predictor. On MIMIC-IV ICU data, three independent evaluations support the framework: (1) latent $\ell_1$ rollout drift uniquely converges ($-$15.7%) over 48-hour horizons while baselines and ablations diverge (+3% to +4951%); (2) the encoder learns a clinically discriminative latent geometry (deteriorating-patient cohorts displace 4.83$\times$ further than stable patients in latent space, vs $\leq$2.62$\times$ for baseline encoders); (3) a single backbone outperforms strong tabular and sequence baselines on multi-task downstream evaluation. Clin-JEPA achieves mean AUROC 0.851 on ICareFM EEP and 0.883 on 8 binary risk tasks (+0.038 and +0.041 vs baseline average).