EvoPINN: Agentic Discovery of Executable Algorithms for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
EvoPINN:面向物理信息神经网络可执行算法的智能体式发现框架
Peng Yin, Kai Li, Yifan Zhang, Jian Cheng
机构
*
School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院大学先进交叉科学学院)
;
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院自动化研究所)
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies
Mitigating Errors in LLM-Generated Web API Invocations via Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Constrained Decoding
通过检索增强生成和约束解码减轻大语言模型生成的Web API调用中的错误
Daniel Maninger, Leon Chemnitz, Jannis Brugger, Tushar Lamba, Amir Molzam Sharifloo, Mira Mezini
机构
*
Technische Universität Darmstadt(德累斯顿技术大学)
;
Hessian Center for Artificial Intelligence (hessian.AI)(黑森人工智能中心)
;
Pariton AI
;
National Research Center for Applied Cybersecurity ATHENE(应用网络安全国家研究中心ATHENE)
Effectiveness of LLM-based Software Diversity for Reliability Improvement -- an Empirical Study
基于大语言模型的软件多样性对可靠性提升的有效性——一项实证研究
Gabriel Almeida, Ilir Gashi, Vladimir Stankovic, João R. Campos
机构
*
University of Coimbra, CISUC/LASI(科英布拉大学,CISUC/LASI)
;
Centre for Software Reliability(软件可靠性中心)
;
Department of Informatics Engineering(信息工程系)
;
Department of Computer Science(计算机科学系)
;
City St George’s, University of London(伦敦城市圣乔治大学)
Citation Discipline in Spec-Driven Development: A Cross-Model Empirical Study of Output Determinism and Automated Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated Code
Know Your Limits : On the Faithfulness of LLMs as Solvers and Autoformalizers in Legal Reasoning
了解你的局限:LLM在法律推理中作为求解器和自动形式化工具的忠实性
Olivia Peiyu Wang, Sanna Wong-Toropainen, Daneshvar Amrollahi, Ryan Bai, Tashvi Bansal, Arush Garg, Leilani H. Gilpin
机构
*
UC Santa Cruz(加州大学圣克鲁兹分校)
;
Univ. Helsinki(赫尔辛基大学)
;
CodeX, Stanford(斯坦福大学CodeX中心)
;
Stanford University(斯坦福大学)
;
Canyon Crest Academy(峡谷峰学院)
;
Monta Vista High School(蒙塔维斯塔高中)
;
Los Altos High School(洛斯阿尔托斯高中)
Comments10 pages, submitted to COLM 2026 (under review, average score of 6.25 across 4 reviewers) and accepted by the AI4Law and AI4Math workshops at ICML. This is the version where we already addressed most of the reviews from the COLM & AI4Law & AI4Math reviewers