arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv quant-ph/9505014quant-ph
收藏

[p,q]不等于(i h-bar)

[p,q] does not equal (i h-bar)

John P. Costella

摘要:

在这个简短的说明中,我指出,[p,q]不等于(i h-bar),与玻恩和乔丹以及狄拉克的原始主张相反。相反,[p,q]等于与(i h-bar)* 无穷小不同 * 的东西。虽然这种差异通常是无害的,但它确实提供了[p,q]的Born-Jordan“迹悖论”的解决方案。最近,在量子场论中发现了一种非常相似形式的微妙之处,它们具有根本的重要性。

英文摘要:

In this short note, I point out that [p,q] does not equal (i h-bar), contrary to the original claims of Born and Jordan, and Dirac. Rather, [p,q] is equal to something that is *infinitesimally different* from (i h-bar). While this difference is usually harmless, it does provide the solution of the Born-Jordan "trace paradox" of [p,q]. More recently, subtleties of a very similar form have been found to be of fundamental importance in quantum field theory.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑