超光速“信号”是一个可接受的假设吗？- 与它们建立通信协议的困难
Are superluminal "signals" an acceptable hypothesis? - Difficulties in building a communication protocol with them
摘要：
局部隐变量假设被反复证明不能解释涉及语境的实验结果。然后，纠缠粒子测量的相关结果，开始归因于粒子之间通过所谓的“信号”进行的通信。这些“信号”需要拥有超光速或时间倒流。没有一个有静止质量的物体，甚至静止质量为零的光子，会有这样的行为。尽管如此，由于假定的“sinals”的性质尚不清楚，人们并不拒绝这个想法，尽管与相对论相冲突。因此，本文从另一个角度审视“信号”：无论在哪里进行通信，都必须存在通信协议。本文试图勾勒出空间分离的纠缠粒子之间的通信协议，并得出一个矛盾，使这种通信的想法非常值得怀疑。
英文摘要：
The local hidden variable assumption was repeatedly proved unable to explain results of experiments in which contextuality is involved. Then, the correlated results of measurements of entangled particles, began to be attributed to a communication between particles through so-called "signals". These "signals" need to possess superluminal velocity or move backward in time. No object that has a rest-mass, not even the photons whose rest mass is zero, behave this way. Still, as the nature of the presumed "sinals" is not known, people don't reject the idea, despite the conflict with the theory of relativity. For this reason, the present article examines the "signals" from another point of view: wherever runs a communication, there has also to exist a communication protocol. The article tries to outline a communication protocol between the space-separated, entangled particles, and comes to a contradiction, making the idea of such a communication highly doubtable.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
