arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv quant-ph/0303091quant-phcs.ET
收藏

对“概率量子存储器”的评论

Comment on "Probabilistic Quantum Memories"

T. Brun, H. Klauck, A. Nayak, M. Roetteler, Ch. Zalka

AI总结:

本文评论指出Trugenberger关于量子寄存器可作为指数级联想存储器的方案不优于同等大小的经典寄存器,并指出Holevo界等界限排除了基于量子态的强大经典信息存储器。

摘要:

这是对C.A. Trugenberger两篇错误的Phys. Rev. Letters论文的评论。Trugenberger声称量子寄存器可用作指数级大的“联想”存储器。我们证明他的方案并不比用量子寄存器替换为同等大小的经典寄存器的方案更好。我们还指出,Holevo界和关于“量子随机存取码”的较新界限几乎排除了基于量子态的强大存储器(用于经典信息)。

英文摘要:

This is a comment on two wrong Phys. Rev. Letters papers by C.A. Trugenberger. Trugenberger claimed that quantum registers could be used as exponentially large "associative" memories. We show that his scheme is no better than one where the quantum register is replaced with a classical one of equal size. We also point out that the Holevo bound and more recent bounds on "quantum random access codes" pretty much rule out powerful memories (for classical information) based on quantum states.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑