微观宇宙调查常规计划和替代研究计划的托勒密性
Ptolemyness of conventional program for microcosm investigations and alternative research program
摘要：
它表明，传统的方法来微观宇宙调查使用一个不正确的假设（不正确的时空模型），其不正确的补偿通过额外的假设，被称为量子力学原则。这样的概念使人想起托勒密的天体力学学说。提出了另一种研究方案，即采用更正确的时空模型，不需要额外的假设（量子原理）来自由解释量子效应。如果在20世纪初，当微观世界的研究开始时，人们知道了更正确的时空模型，那么量子力学就可以以另一种方式发展。另一种研究方案出现了一个长期的延迟，因为所有这段时间必要的数学技术是不可用的研究人员。缺乏必要的数学技术与一些偏见有关，这些偏见在建立新的几何概念和统计描述时已经被克服。本文介绍了新的数学技术的基本论述及其在替代研究计划中的应用原则。
英文摘要：
It is shown that the conventional approach to microcosm investigations uses an incorrect supposition (incorrect space-time model) whose incorrectness is compensated by means of additional hypotheses, known as quantum mechanics principles. Such a conception reminds the Ptolemaic doctrine of celestial mechanics. Alternative research program, which uses a more correct space-time model and does not need additional hypotheses (quantum principles) for free explanations of quantum effects, is suggested. If the more correct space-time model were known in the beginning of XXth century, when research of microcosm started, quantum mechanics could develop in other way. The alternative research program appeared with a secular delay, because all this time the necessary mathematical technique was not available for researchers. Absence of necessary mathematical technique is connected with some prejudices which have been overcame at the construction of new conception of geometry and that of statistical description. Basic statements of the new mathematical technique and principles of its application in alternative research program are presented in the paper.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
