玻姆理论中是否存在物质对象
Discussion: Are There Material Objects in Bohm's Theory
摘要：
贝达德认为，玻姆理论的“极简主义”解释“没有意义”，本质上是因为人们不能仅用粒子的共构来解释成键性质。我认为，虽然这一点是正确的，但最低限度的解释从未试图提供这样的解释（也不是这种解释的义务）。
英文摘要：
Bedard has argued that the 'minimalist' interpretation of Bohm's theory "do[es] not make sense", essentially because one cannot account for bonding properties in terms of particles cofigurations alone. I argue that while this point is correct, the minimalist interpretation never sought to provide such an explanation (nor is it incumbant upon this interpretation to do so).
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
