arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv physics/0611077physics.gen-ph
收藏

以太理论时钟延迟与狭义相对论时间膨胀

Aether Theory Clock Retardation vs. Special Relativity Time Dilation

Joseph Levy

摘要:

假设以太模型不被天体的运动所携带,人们可以对影响时钟运动时时间测量的实验过程提供合理的解释。与狭义相对论相反,以太理论并不认为时间本身会受到运动的影响;运动的时钟显示的读数来自两个事实:1/由于它们在以太中的运动,它们的滴答声比在以太框架中慢。2/通常的同步过程产生同步差异效应。这些事实引起了时间测量的改变,正如我们将要说明的那样,这正好解释了实验结果。特别是,它们能够解决一个狭义相对论无法解释的明显悖论(见第4章)。当测量失真被校正时,时间在以直线匀速运动彼此远离的所有坐标系中被证明是相同的。这些考虑强烈支持特权以太框架的存在。其结果涉及到狭义相对论(SR)以及作为SR的扩展的广义相对论(GR)。我们应该注意到,爱因斯坦本人从1916年开始意识到以太的必要性,这与传统的相对论相反。然而,这里提出的以太模型与爱因斯坦的不同之处在于,它假设以太漂移的存在,这与G.F.斯穆特和他的同事们在2006年12月8日的斯穆特诺贝尔演讲中被列出。虽然它提到了以前的研究,但这一文本仍然是自给自足的。

英文摘要:

Assuming a model of aether non-entrained by the motion of celestial bodies, one can provide a rational explanation of the experimental processes affecting the measurement of time when clocks are in motion. Contrary to special relativity, aether theory does not assume that the time itself is affected by motion; the reading displayed by the moving clocks results from two facts: 1/ Due to their movement through the aether, they tick at a slower rate than in the aether frame. 2/ The usual synchronization procedures generate a synchronism discrepancy effect. These facts give rise to an alteration of the measurement of time which, as we shall show, exactly explains the experimental results. In particular, they enable to solve an apparent paradox that special relativity cannot explain (see chapter 4). When the measurement distortions are corrected, the time proves to be the same in all co-ordinate systems moving away from one another with rectilinear uniform motion. These considerations strongly support the existence of a privileged aether frame. The consequences concern special relativity (SR) as well as general relativity (GR) which is an extension of SR. We should note that Einstein himself became conscious of the necessity of the aether from 1916, in contrast with conventional relativity. Yet the model of aether presented here differs from Einsein in that it assumes the existence of an aether drift, in agreement with the discoveries of G.F. Smoot and his co-workers listed in Smoot Nobel Lecture, December 8th 2006. Although it makes reference to previous studies, this text remains self-sufficient.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑