科学评估的弱点：沉默的赞美
The Weakness of the Scientific Assessments: A Praise of Silence
摘要：
这篇文章的目的是显示目前的科学评估的弱点，基于一组矛盾的伪公理。对这六个伪公理进行了深入分析。从分析中得出了几个结论。尽管科学家们为了获得资金或控制学术和高等教育机构而认真努力建立荣誉排名，但科学本身并不存在，而是各种知识。因此，科学家并不控制科学;他们仅仅是某个知识领域的专家，这个领域可以用许多有效的方式来表达。这种多样性决定了许多学术课程模式的存在，这些模式基于随着历史而变化的异质评价方式。
英文摘要：
This article aims to show the weakness of the current scientific assessments, based on a set of contradictory pseudo-axioms. The six pseudo-axioms are deeply analysed. From the analysis are derived several conclusions. In spite of the serious efforts of the scientists to establish a ranking of honors in order to get funds or to control the academic and higher education institutions, the Science doesn't exists in itself, but different kinds of knowledge. Therefore, the scientists don't control the Science; they are mere experts in a field of knowledge, which could be expressed in many valid ways. This variety determines the existence of many models of academic curricula, based on heterogeneous ways of valuation that change along the History.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
