标准延迟条件不适用于束缚磁场和新的广义毕奥-萨伐尔定律的实验证据
Experimental Evidence on Non-Applicability of the Standard Retardation Condition to Bound Magnetic Fields and on New Generalized Biot-Savart Law
摘要：
在这项工作中，我们的速度依赖（约束）场分量的标准电磁理论的框架内的当前状态进行了分析。对理想振荡磁偶极子产生的磁场结构进行了初步讨论，定量分析了速度相关项（束缚）和加速度相关项（辐射）对合成磁场的相对贡献。根据这一分析，我们定义的方法方案的基础上，广义（时间依赖性）的毕奥-萨伐尔定律能够测试的适用性的标准延迟条件上绑定字段组件。在这项工作的第二部分中，我们的有限尺寸的多节天线的理论分析，确认的方法方案的有效性设想的理想化的磁偶极子。多节天线的使用是完全合理的结合辐射场强比的大幅上升。最后，我们进行了数值计算，考虑到特定的实验设置，并将它们与实验获得的数据进行比较，这些数据明确地表明了标准延迟条件对束缚磁场的不适用性。此外，实验观察表明，一个新的广义毕奥-萨伐尔定律的预测，这意味着束缚场的传播速度大大超过光速惊人的巧合。
英文摘要：
In this work we made an analysis of the current status of velocity dependent (bound) field components in the framework of the standard electromagnetic theory. Preliminary discussions of the structure of the magnetic field due to an idealized oscillating magnetic dipole provided us with the quantitative insights on the relative contribution of velocity dependent (bound) and acceleration dependent (radiation) terms into the resultant magnetic field. According to this analysis we defined the methodological scheme based on a generalized (time-dependent) Biot-Savart law capable to test the applicability of the standard retardation condition on bound field components. In the second part of this work we made the theoretical analysis of the finite size multi-section antennas, confirming the validity of the methodological scheme conceived for an idealized magnetic dipole. The use of multi-section antennas is fully justified by a substantial rise of the ratio of bound-to-radiation field strength. Finally, we effected numerical calculations taking into account particular experimental settings and compared them with experimentally obtained data that unambiguously indicate on the non-applicability of the standard retardation condition to bound magnetic fields. In addition, experimental observations show a striking coincidence with the predictions of a new generalized Biot-Savart law which implies the spreading velocity of bound fields highly exceeding the velocity of light.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
