147个化学研究组的Hirsch指数与标准文献计量学指标和同行评议的比较
Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups
摘要：
在本文中，我们提出的赫希（h-）指数和几个标准的文献计量学指标之间的统计相关性的特点，以及与同行评议的判断结果。我们使用的147所大学的化学研究小组在荷兰涵盖了约700名高级研究人员在1991-2000年期间的工作的大型评估研究的结果。因此，我们处理研究小组，而不是个别科学家，因为我们认为研究小组是研究中最重要的工作场所单位，特别是在自然科学。此外，我们将引用期限制在三年的窗口，而不是生命时间计数，以关注最近的工作的影响，从而对当前的研究表现。结果表明，h指数和我们的文献计量学冠指标都与同行的判断相当的方式。但对于引用流量较少的领域中的较小群体，皇冠指标似乎是一个更合适的研究绩效衡量标准。
英文摘要：
In this paper we present characteristics of the statistical correlation between the Hirsch (h-) index and several standard bibliometric indicators, as well as with the results of peer review judgment. We use the results of a large evaluation study of 147 university chemistry research groups in the Netherlands covering the work of about 700 senior researchers during the period 1991-2000. Thus, we deal with research groups rather than individual scientists, as we consider the research group as the most important work floor unit in research, particularly in the natural sciences. Furthermore, we restrict the citation period to a three-year window instead of life time counts in order to focus on the impact of recent work and thus on current research performance. Results show that the h-index and our bibliometric crown indicator both relate in a quite comparable way with peer judgments. But for smaller groups in fields with less heavy citation traffic the crown indicator appears to be a more appropriate measure of research performance.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
