亚里士多德与乔达摩论逻辑与物理
Aristotle and Gautama on Logic and Physics
摘要：
逻辑学作为一门形式学科的起源问题对物理学史家特别有意义，因为它代表了一种向内的转向，即考察推理的本质以及思维与现实之间的关系。在西方，亚里士多德（公元前384-322年）通常被认为是逻辑传统的形式化和早期物理学的发展。在印度，梨俱吠陀本身在赞美诗10.129暗示了现实的代表性的开始，在各种逻辑划分方面，后来正式表示为四个圆圈：“A”，“不是A”，“：A而不是A”，“不是A而不是A”。根据《古兰经》的记载，Medhatithi乔达摩和Aksapada乔达摩（或乔达摩），这可能是印度逻辑学早期正式文本作者的两个变体名称，属于大约公元前550年。希腊和印度的传统似乎提供了逻辑的最早形式表示，在这篇文章中，我们问他们是否相互影响。我们也对早期逻辑学的范围感兴趣，因为这使我们了解早期思想家思考自然和变化的方式。我们将说明，希腊和印度的逻辑传统有许多独特的东西，它们一定是独立出现的。
英文摘要：
The question of the origins of logic as a formal discipline is of special interest to the historian of physics since it represents a turning inward to examine the very nature of reasoning and the relationship between thought and reality. In the West, Aristotle (384-322 BCE) is generally credited with the formalization of the tradition of logic and also with the development of early physics. In India, the Rigveda itself in the hymn 10.129 suggests the beginnings of the representation of reality in terms of various logical divisions that were later represented formally as the four circles of: "A", "not A", ":A and not A", and "not A and not not A''. According to Puranic accounts, Medhatithi Gautama and Aksapada Gautama (or Gotama), which are perhaps two variant names for the author of the early formal text on Indian logic, belonged to about 550 BCE. The Greek and the Indian traditions seem to provide the earliest formal representations of logic, and in this article we ask if they influenced each other. We are also interested in the scope of early logic, since this gives an idea to us of the way early thinkers thought about nature and change. We will show that Greek and Indian logical traditions have much that is distinctive and unique and that they must have emerged independently.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
