评论“扭矩或没有扭矩？”在不同惯性系中观察到的简单带电粒子运动。杰克逊[Am. 72（12），1484-1487（2004）]
Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)]
摘要：
本文指出Jackson [J.D.杰克逊，Am. 72，1484（2004）]的方法是使用三维（3D）量E，B，F，L，N，. .当使用4D几何量时，就没有悖论，相对性原理自然得到满足。
英文摘要：
In this paper it is shown that the real cause of the apparent electrodynamic paradox discussed by Jackson [J. D. Jackson, Am. J. Phys. 72, 1484 (2004)] is the use of three-dimensional (3D) quantities E, B, F, L, N, .. . When 4D geometric quantities are used then there is no paradox and the principle of relativity is naturally satisfied.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
