四力熵：力学的基础
Quadrimechanica Entropy: the basis of mechanics
摘要：
经典、量子、相对论和统计：力学的四个分支。然而，物理学的Quattro Donna甚至不同意被认为是基本的实体，如空间，物质和时间。为了寻找一个联盟，这方面的贡献认为不确定性在古典背景下，并采取了一条道路的基础上，可以命名为事实的分裂，而不是传统的因果关系的方法。这就推翻了“可观察实体”和“可测量量”之间的主要区分。恢复原始的经典实验，用不同的时间描述“自由降落“--“下落”的“轻”物体的弛豫时间（m1，m2，.）;“重”（M）物体的特征时间和力学系统的变化率[M，m1，m2，...]-这一过程导致了牛顿力学从一个简单的实验中提取数据的结论。发展状态演化（熵）的概念，一个以可观测性为中心的论点倾向于一个统一的公式，以非线性的“经典”方程为代价。
英文摘要：
Classical, Quantum, Relativistic and Statistical: the four branches of mechanics. However, the Quattro Donna of Physics disagree even about the entities that are supposed to be fundamental, such as space, matter and time. In order to search for an union, this contribution considers Indeterminacy in a Classical context and takes a path based on a division that could be named factual as opposed to the conventional approach of cause and effects. This sets back a primary division between "observable entities" and "measurable quantities". Recovering the primordial Classical experiment and describing the "Free Fall" in terms of distinct times - the relaxation time of the ("falling") 'light' bodies (m1, m2,...); the characteristic time of the 'heavy' (M) body and the rate of change of the mechanical system [M, m1, m2, ...]- the procedure led to conclude that Newtonian Mechanics extracted data from a gedanken experiment. Developing the concept of evolution of states (Entropy), an argument centred on Observability favours a uniform formulation, at the cost of non-linear "Classical" equations.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
