核力就是引力。爱因斯坦是对的吗？
The Nuclear Force is Gravitation. Was Einstein Right?
摘要：
我把普朗克长度、广义相对论和牛顿引力的影响结合在一个方程中，提出了一个偏离牛顿引力的半经典引力模型。爱因斯坦用引力解释了核力（参考文献2）。这段话明确地表达了爱因斯坦的尝试，并将其描述为误导。我的模型表明爱因斯坦试图用引力来解释核力并没有被误导。我的模型显示恰恰相反。我用普朗克长度，因为它是：最小的距离，使任何意义。我从广义相对论中学到了一个关于质量和空间的亚原子区别。广义相对论是关于质量告诉空间如何弯曲，空间告诉质量如何运动。与弦论不同，我没有使用虚维度。我的模型预测最大核力是引力的极限，并且以前所未有的一致方式清楚地在宏观尺度上产生牛顿引力：再见量子引力。我把牛顿、普朗克和爱因斯坦结合在一起，预测引力的极限，就像卡拉什卡尔预测他的极限一样。
英文摘要：
I combine the effects of Planck length, general relativity and Newtonian gravity in one equation, to come up with a semi-classical model of gravity in the form of deviation from Newtonian gravity. Einstein explained nuclear forces in terms of gravity (Ref. 2). This reference is explicit in expressing Einstein's attempts and describes them as misguided. My model shows Einstein was not misguided in his attempts to explain nuclear forces in terms of gravity. My model shows just the contrary. I use Planck length as what it is: minimum distance that makes any sense. I make a subatomic distinction between mass and space, a lesson learned from general relativity. General relativity is about mass telling space how to curve and space telling mass how to move. Unlike string theory, I use no imaginary dimensions. My model predicts maximum nuclear force as the limit of gravitation and clearly yields Newtonian gravity at a macroscopic scale in an unprecedented and consistent manner: Good-by to quantum gravity. I am combining Newton, Planck and Einstein and to predict a limit of gravity as Chandrashekhar did to predict his limit.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
