arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv math/0602559math.NAcs.NAmath.PR
收藏

通过凸松弛的稀疏重建:傅里叶和高斯测量

Sparse reconstruction by convex relaxation: Fourier and Gaussian measurements

Mark Rudelson, Roman Vershynin

AI总结:

本文利用凸松弛方法研究稀疏信号的重建问题,针对高斯测量和傅里叶测量分别给出了具有合理常数的最优或近最优测量数估计。

摘要:

我们想要从少量的线性测量(与某些固定向量的内积)中精确重建一个稀疏信号 f(R^n 中具有小支撑的向量)。自 80 年代以来,Dave Donoho 及其合作者一直倡导一种通过线性规划实现的直观且优雅的重建方法。也就是说,可以将高度非凸的重建问题松弛为凸问题——而且进一步松弛为线性规划。然而,重建问题何时等价于其凸松弛仍是一个开放问题。最近许多作者的工作表明,使用凸松弛方法从线性测量中精确重建任何长度为 n、支撑为 r 的 r-稀疏信号 f(R^n 中支撑为 r 的向量)所需的测量数 k(r,n) 通常为 O(r polylog(n))。然而,尽管算法在实践中表现非常好,但已知的测量数 k(r,n) 估计包含巨大的常数。在本文中,我们考虑随机高斯测量和随机傅里叶测量(f 的频率样本)。对于高斯测量,我们首次证明了具有合理常数的保证:k(r,n) < 12 r (2 + log(n/r)),这在常数意义上是最优的。对于傅里叶测量,我们证明了已知的最佳界 k(r,n) = O(r log(n) . log^2(r) log(r log n)),这在 log log n 和 log^3 r 因子内是最优的。我们的论证基于巴拿赫空间中的几何泛函分析和概率技术。

英文摘要:

We want to exactly reconstruct a sparse signal f (a vector in R^n of small support) from few linear measurements of f (inner products with some fixed vectors). A nice and intuitive reconstruction by Linear Programming has been advocated since 80-ies by Dave Donoho and his collaborators. Namely, one can relax the reconstruction problem, which is highly nonconvex, to a convex problem -- and, moreover, to a linear program. However, when is exactly the reconstruction problem equivalent to its convex relaxation is an open question. Recent work of many authors shows that the number of measurements k(r,n) needed to exactly reconstruct any r-sparse signal f of length n (a vector in R^n of support r) from its linear measurements with the convex relaxation method is usually O(r polylog(n)). However, known estimates of the number of measurements k(r,n) involve huge constants, in spite of very good performance of the algorithms in practice. In this paper, we consider random Gaussian measurements and random Fourier measurements (a frequency sample of f). For Gaussian measurements, we prove the first guarantees with reasonable constants: k(r,n) < 12 r (2 + log(n/r)), which is optimal up to constants. For Fourier measurements, we prove the best known bound k(r,n) = O(r log(n) . log^2(r) log(r log n)), which is optimal within the log log n and log^3 r factors. Our arguments are based on the technique of Geometric Functional Analysis and Probability in Banach spaces.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑