arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv math/0410574math.STcs.GLphysics.soc-phstat.TH
收藏

不同科学领域被引次数所表示的科学影响力的比较

A note on comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science

Igor Podlubny

摘要:

分析了美国国家科学基金会2004年报告中1992、1994、1996、1997、1999和2001年的引文分布。结果表明,任何两个广泛的科学领域的引文总数的比例保持接近恒定的分析年。基于这一观察,规范化的引文总数相对于数学中的引文数量,建议作为一种工具,比较科学的影响所表示的引文数量在不同的科学领域。

英文摘要:

Citation distributions for 1992, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1999, and 2001, which were published in the 2004 report of the National Science Foundation, USA, are analyzed. It is shown that the ratio of the total number of citations of any two broad fields of science remains close to constant over the analyzed years. Based on this observation, normalization of total numbers of citations with respect to the number of citations in mathematics is suggested as a tool for comparing scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑