q-Poisson, q-Dobinski, q-Rota and q-coherent states
英文摘要：
q- Dobinski formula may be interpreted as the average of powers of a random variable X_q with the q- Poisson distribution.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
相关论文
Poisson, Dobinski, Rota and coherent states
New q- Dobinski formula might also be interpreted as the average of specific q-powers of random variable X with the usual Poisson distribution.
cs.DMmath.CO
$ψ$-Poisson, $q$-Cigler, $ψ$-Dobinski, $ψ$-Rota and $ψ$-coherent states
Cigler simple derivation of usual and extended Dobinski formula is recalled and it is noted that both may be interpreted as averages of powers of random variables with the corresponding usual or extended Poisson distributions. In parallel more general formulas of extended operator umbral calculi origin are revealed . The formulas encompass both earlier cases as very specific ones.
cs.DMmath.CO
On umbral extensions of Stirling numbers and Dobinski-like formulas
Umbral extensions of the stirling numbers of the second kind are considered and the resulting dobinski-like various formulas including new ones are presented. These extensions naturally encompass the two well known q-extensions. The further consecutive umbral extensions q-stirling numbers are therefore realized here in a two-fold way. The fact that the umbral q-extended dobinski formula may also be interpreted as the average of powers of random variable with the q-poisson distribution singles out the q-extensions which appear to be a kind of singular point in the domain of umbral extensions as…
cs.DMmath.CO
Umbral nature of the Poisson random variables
Extending the rigorous presentation of the classical umbral calculus given by Rota and Taylor in 1994, the so-called partition polynomials are interpreted with the aim to point out the umbral nature of the Poisson random variables. Among the new umbrae introduced, the main tool is the partition umbra that leads also to a simple expression of the functional composition of the exponential power series. Moreover a new short proof of the Lagrange inversion formula is given.
math.COmath.PR
