arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv math/0310357math.OCcs.NAmath.NA
收藏

罚内点法不收敛

Penalty Interior-Point Method Fails to Converge

Sven Leyffer

AI总结:

本文通过一个小例子证明罚内点算法(PIPA)在求解具有互补约束的数学规划时可能收敛到非平稳点,为现有理论提供反例并分析原因。

摘要:

互补条件形式的平衡方程经常作为约束出现在优化问题中。这类问题通常被称为具有互补约束的数学规划(MPCCs)。求解MPCCs的一种流行方法是罚内点算法(PIPA)。本文提出了一个小例子,在该例子中PIPA收敛到一个非平稳点,为已有理论提供了一个反例。文中讨论了这种不良行为的原因。

英文摘要:

Equilibrium equations in the form of complementarity conditions often appear as constraints in optimization problems. Problems of this type are commonly referred to as mathematical programs with complementarity constraints (MPCCs). A popular method for solving MPCCs is the penalty interior-point algorithm (PIPA). This paper presents a small example for which PIPA converges to a nonstationary point, providing a counterexample to the established theory. The reasons for this adverse behavior are discussed.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑