从一个音形词典DB看词汇的统一
Unifying Lexicons in view of a Phonological and Morphological Lexical DB
摘要：
目前的工作属于欧洲语言资源协会（ELRA）生产委员会（PCom）的活动，并提出了方法，程序和工具的可重用性，创建和管理的语言资源。这个实验有两个目的。第一个目标是调查将两种格式不兼容且信息互补的意大利词汇资源组合到统一词典（UL）中的可行性，定义方法和程序。所采用的策略和任命的程序与合并任务的驱动标准，追求人类和计算努力之间的平衡。通过使用简单和快速的匹配过程，UL的覆盖范围已被最大化。第二个目的是利用这一新获得的资源，实现CLIPS词汇数据库的语音和形态层。实现这些新的层并将它们与已经存在的语法和语义层连接起来并不是一项简单的任务。模型所施加的限制，在架构层面的影响和解决方案，以使整个数据库有效地“说话”。优点与缺点进行了讨论。
英文摘要：
The present work falls in the line of activities promoted by the European Languguage Resource Association (ELRA) Production Committee (PCom) and raises issues in methods, procedures and tools for the reusability, creation, and management of Language Resources. A two-fold purpose lies behind this experiment. The first aim is to investigate the feasibility, define methods and procedures for combining two Italian lexical resources that have incompatible formats and complementary information into a Unified Lexicon (UL). The adopted strategy and the procedures appointed are described together with the driving criterion of the merging task, where a balance between human and computational efforts is pursued. The coverage of the UL has been maximized, by making use of simple and fast matching procedures. The second aim is to exploit this newly obtained resource for implementing the phonological and morphological layers of the CLIPS lexical database. Implementing these new layers and linking them with the already exisitng syntactic and semantic layers is not a trivial task. The constraints imposed by the model, the impact at the architectural level and the solution adopted in order to make the whole database `speak' efficiently are presented. Advantages vs. disadvantages are discussed.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
