arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv cs/0611153cs.HC
收藏

改变我们对设计评估会议方法论的看法:软件技术评审会议的研究

Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: a study of software technical review meetings

Patrick D'Astous, Françoise Détienne, Willemien Visser, Pierre Robillard

摘要:

与设计会议相比,设计评估会议(DEM)通常被认为是一种情况,根据DEM方法,设计活动是相当边缘的。在软件开发中的DEM研究中,即在特定评审方法之后的技术评审会议中,我们表明:(i)设计活动作为论证过程的一部分的发生;(ii)认知同步作为评估的先决条件的相对重要性;(iii)通过明确潜在设计原理(DR)的论证在评估中发挥的重要作用。我们的研究结果的基础上,我们讨论了在这种会议中使用DR方法的潜力。

英文摘要:

By contrast to design meetings, design evaluation meetings (DEMs) have generally been considered as situations in which, according to DEMs methodologies, design activities are quite marginal. In a study of DEMs in software development, i.e. in technical review meetings following a particular review methodology, we showed: (i) the occurrence of design activities as part of an argumentation process; (ii) the relative importance of cognitive synchronisation as a prerequisite for evaluation; (iii) the important role played in evaluation by argumentation that makes explicit the underlying design rationale (DR). On the basis of our results, we discuss the potential for using DR methodologies in this kind of meetings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑