arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
稍安勿躁,官方尚未更新
arXiv cs/0209014cs.DScs.DC
收藏

异步共识的随机化协议

Randomized protocols for asynchronous consensus

James Aspnes

摘要:

著名的Fischer、Lynch和Paterson不可能性证明表明,在异步分布式系统的自然模型中,即使一个进程可能失败,也不可能解决共识问题。自发表以来,二十年的容错异步共识算法的工作已经回避了这个不可能的结果,通过使用扩展模型,提供(a)随机化,(b)额外的定时假设,(c)故障检测器,或(d)更强的同步机制比在基本模型。集中在这些方法中的第一个,我们说明了随机异步共识协议的历史和结构,给出了几个这样的协议的详细描述。

英文摘要:

The famous Fischer, Lynch, and Paterson impossibility proof shows that it is impossible to solve the consensus problem in a natural model of an asynchronous distributed system if even a single process can fail. Since its publication, two decades of work on fault-tolerant asynchronous consensus algorithms have evaded this impossibility result by using extended models that provide (a) randomization, (b) additional timing assumptions, (c) failure detectors, or (d) stronger synchronization mechanisms than are available in the basic model. Concentrating on the first of these approaches, we illustrate the history and structure of randomized asynchronous consensus protocols by giving detailed descriptions of several such protocols.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑