自下而上分析ENUM服务和管理：IP电话及其他的寻址系统
Analyzing ENUM Service and Administration from the Bottom Up: The addressing system for IP telephony and beyond
摘要：
ENUM创造了许多新的市场机会，并提出了与ENUM数据库和服务的实施和管理有关的若干重要政策问题。最近的2001年世界电信政策论坛讨论了ENUM作为IP电话的一个重要编号问题的出现。本文采用自底向上的研究方法，对ENUM管理和政策的一些重要新兴问题进行了准备。我们将确定潜在的关键ENUM服务，并估计PSTN-IP寻址和映射机制的可用性所创造的服务市场机会的规模，特别是在IP电话的背景下。此外，我们分析了可能的管理模式和不同的ENUM球员之间的关系方案，如注册表（IES），注册商，电话服务提供商，ENUM应用程序服务提供商等，然后，我们将评估ENUM服务的各种管理模式架构的影响，通过寻找市场机会和球员的动机。从实证结果中，我们将得出不同类型的ENUM服务提供商之间的交易的影响。最后，模型分析的结果将用于围绕ENUM和IP电话服务的政策相关问题的讨论。保留字：IP电话，ENUM，互联网政策，号码和地址系统，服务和市场研究，管理模式，实证市场研究。
英文摘要：
ENUM creates many new market opportunities and raises several important policy issues related to the implementation and administration of the ENUM database and services. Recent World Telecommunications Policy Forum 2001 dealt with the emergence of ENUM as an important numbering issue of IP telephony. This paper prepares some important emerging issues of ENUM administration and policy by taking an empirical research approach from the bottom up. We will identify potential key ENUM services, and estimating the size of the service market opportunities created by the availability of PSTN-IP addressing and mapping mechanisms, particularly in the context of IP telephony. Also, we analyze the possible administrative models and relationship scenarios among different ENUM players such as Registry(ies), Registrars, Telephone Service Providers, ENUM Application Service Providers, etc. Then, we will assess the effects of various administrative model architectures of ENUM service by looking at the market opportunities and motivations of the players. From the empirical findings, we will draw the implications on transactions among different kinds of ENUM service providers. Finally, the results of the model analysis will be used for the discussion of policy related issues around the ENUM and IP telephony services. Keywords: IP Telephony, ENUM, Internet Policy, Numbering and Addressing System, Service and Market Study, Administration Model, Empirical Market Study.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
