arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2610.19082cs.RO
收藏

面向高度遮挡目标感知的滚动时域下最优下一个视点规划

Receding-Horizon Next-Best-View Planning for Highly Occluded Target Perception

Radboud University(拉德堡德大学);School of Artificial Intelligence(人工智能学院);Donders Centre for Cognition(东德斯认知中心)

Ayse Gul Yildiz, Rekha Raja

AI总结:

该研究针对机器人目标感知的遮挡问题,提出RH-NBV规划器,通过多步视点序列评估提升重度遮挡下的目标信息恢复,在咖啡杯等实验中性能优于单步NBV基线。

摘要:

需要获取特定目标信息的机器人系统常面临来自周围结构或目标自身的严重遮挡,单个相机视点仅能提供部分信息,因此主动感知需选择能逐步揭示未观测区域的视点。然而,传统局部最优下一个视点(NBV)方法通常根据即时效用选择视点,可能忽略初始信息有限但能从后续视点获得更具信息性观测的视点。我们将局部目标感知建模为短时域顺序视点规划问题,提出了滚动时域最优下一个视点(RH-NBV)规划器,该规划器评估未来视点的候选序列而非孤立视点。在仿真和物理机器人上,我们使用UR5e机械臂与眼在手RGB-D相机,在受控遮挡下以咖啡杯和斯坦福兔子、自然自遮挡下以番茄植物,将RH-NBV与基于梯度的NBV规划器及随机搜索进行对比评估。在重度遮挡下,RH-NBV实现了显著更高的目标信息恢复:在遮挡最严重的咖啡杯配置中,ROI覆盖率达63.8%,而单步NBV基线为34.2%;遮挡表面召回率达85.5%,而单步NBV基线为7.4%。受控时域 ablation 实验表明,该改进源于多步推理而非额外计算。RH-NBV在强遮挡目标上效益最大,而近视型NBV在可见性约束较小时仍具竞争力且成本显著更低。

英文摘要:

Robotic systems that must acquire information about a specific target often face severe occlusion from sur- rounding structures or from the target itself, such that a single camera viewpoint provides only partial information. Active perception must therefore select viewpoints that progressively reveal unobserved regions. However, conventional local next- best-view (NBV) methods typically select viewpoints according to their immediate utility, which can overlook views that provide limited information initially but enable more informative obser- vations from subsequent viewpoints. We formulated local target perception as a short-horizon sequential view-planning problem and proposed a Receding-Horizon Next-Best-View (RH-NBV) planner that evaluates candidate sequences of future viewpoints rather than isolated views. RH-NBV is evaluated on a UR5e manipulator with an eye-in-hand RGB-D camera in simulation as well as on physical robot against a gradient-based NBV planner, and random search, using a coffee mug and Stanford bunny under controlled occlusion and a tomato plant with natural self-occlusion. Under heavy occlusion, RH-NBV achieves substantially higher target information recovery, reaching 63.8% ROI coverage versus 34.2% and 85.5% occluded-surface recall versus 7.4% for the single-step NBV baselines on the most occluded mug configuration. A controlled horizon ablation shows that this improvement arises from multi-step reasoning rather than additional computation. RH-NBV provides the greatest benefit for strongly occluded targets, while myopic NBV remains competitive and substantially cheaper when visibility is less constrained.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑