arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2610.17751cs.MAcs.AIcs.LG

多智能体协作中的自由度:集中式与分散式机制之间

Degrees of Freedom in Multi-Agent Coordination: Between Centralized and Decentralized Regimes

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)(香港科技大学(广州));Wake Forest University(维克森林大学);Shandong University(山东大学);University of Science and Technology of China(中国科学技术大学)

Yiqing Peng, Hehai Lin, Zixuan Wang, Dongyi Zhang, Zhengjie Zhu, Yi Han, Yangyang Zheng, Hao Wang, Qian Li, Chengwei Qin

AI总结:

该研究提出自由度(DoF)框架,揭示LLM多智能体系统中集中式与分散式协作间的中间机制,发现多数场景下中间DoF配置性能更优,为设计中间协作机制提供实证指导。

摘要:

基于大语言模型(LLM)的多智能体系统(MAS)通常围绕两种协作机制组织:集中式协作提供明确控制,但会在单一协作节点处形成瓶颈;分散式协作提供局部自主权,但必须通过分布式决策和经验实现有效协作。这些权衡促使对两种机制之间的空间进行系统研究。我们引入自由度(DoF),这是一种连续配置框架,用于量化委派给下游智能体的决策空间大小。DoF控制委派工作的粒度以及每个任务单元分配给分支的目标概率,其端点对应两种协作机制。在多个任务领域中,DoF揭示了组织效应的层级结构:委派粒度和机制内路由产生结构化但有界的配置重新分配,而任务领域和保留的经验与集中式和分散式分支配置之间更强的差异相关。由此产生的性能格局依赖于任务:不同领域偏好不同的DoF配置,而原子目标条件在各次运行中更一致;领域内保留的经验使两个分支配置更接近。同样的受控扫描揭示了依赖于任务的协作格局:部分领域表现出更高性能的配置,而其他领域则呈现更平缓的响应,且没有单一配置在所有领域中占主导。在评估的6个状态中的5个里,中间DoF配置的平均准确率高于两个端点,证明了探索两种机制之间协作空间的价值。这些发现为研究和设计基于LLM的MAS中的中间协作机制提供了实证指导。

英文摘要:

Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) are commonly organized around two coordination regimes. Centralized coordination provides explicit control but can create a bottleneck at a single coordination locus, whereas decentralized coordination offers local autonomy but must achieve effective collaboration through distributed decisions and experience. These trade-offs motivate a systematic study of the space between the two regimes. We introduce Degrees of Freedom (DoF), a continuous configuration framework that quantifies the size of the decision space delegated to downstream agents. DoF controls the granularity of delegated work and the target probability that each task unit is assigned to the branches. Its endpoints recover the two coordination regimes. Across multiple task domains, DoF reveals a hierarchy of organizational effects. Delegated granularity and within-regime routing produce structured but bounded profile reallocations, whereas task domain and retained experience are associated with stronger differences between the centralized- and decentralized-branch profiles. The resulting performance landscape is task-dependent: different domains favor different DoF configurations, while atomic-target conditions are more consistent across runs. In-domain retained experience brings the two branch profiles closer together. The same controlled sweep reveals a task-dependent coordination landscape: some domains exhibit higher-performing configurations, whereas others show flatter responses and no single configuration dominates across domains. In five of the six evaluated state, an intermediate DoF configuration achieves higher mean accuracy than both endpoints, demonstrating the value of exploring the coordination space between them. Together, these findings provide empirical guidance for studying and designing intermediate coordination regimes in LLM-based MAS.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑