arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

MAP2:结合MPC与高斯过程残差学习的基于模型和加速度的自主赛车追踪算法

MAP2: Model- and Acceleration-Based Pursuit with MPC and Gaussian Process Residual Learning for Autonomous Racing

Weizhan Huang, Cheng Hu, Edoardo Ghignone, Nicolas Baumann, Yiqin Wang, Hongye Su, Lei Xie, Michele Magno

arXiv 2610.12196首次发表:更新:

发表机构

Zhejiang University; ETH Zurich; Center for Project-Based Learning(浙江大学; 苏黎世联邦理工学院; 项目式学习中心)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

针对自主赛车极限操控下几何控制器失效的问题,提出结合MPC与SGP残差校正的MAP2算法,实车实验显示其跟踪误差和单圈时间均显著优于MAP与PP。

AI 中文摘要

自主赛车需要在车辆操控极限附近实现精确的轨迹跟踪,同时保持较低的计算延迟。几何控制器计算效率高,但阿克曼转向几何在极限操控条件下会失效。基于模型和加速度的追踪(MAP)保留了几何方法的简洁性,同时利用了轮胎动力学,但它本质上仍是依赖阿克曼转向几何的几何控制器,其轮胎模型可能无法完全捕捉车辆的实际动态响应。本文提出MAP2,一种结合基于曲率的运动学模型预测控制(MPC)与稀疏高斯过程(SGP)残差校正的基于模型的追踪控制器。该算法利用MPC在预测时域内优化运动学控制输入,并通过经SGP残差校正增强的轮胎动力学模型将其映射为转向指令。实车实验表明,MAP2的横向跟踪误差和单圈时间均大幅降低;与MAP和纯追踪(PP)相比,MAP2的平均横向跟踪误差分别降低37.99%和44.65%,平均单圈时间至少降低1.5%。

英文摘要

Autonomous racing requires accurate trajectory tracking near the handling limits of a vehicle while maintaining low computational latency. Geometric controllers are computationally efficient, but the Ackermann steering geometry becomes invalid under limit-handling conditions. Model- and Acceleration-based Pursuit (MAP) preserves the simplicity of geometric approaches while leveraging tire dynamics. Yet MAP remains fundamentally a geometric controller that relies on Ackermann steering geometry, and its tire model may not fully capture the vehicle's actual dynamic response. This paper presents MAP2, a model-based pursuit controller that combines a curvature-based kinematic MPC and a Sparse Gaussian Process (SGP) residual correction. The proposed algorithm uses MPC to optimize kinematic control inputs over a prediction horizon and maps them to steering commands through a tire dynamics model augmented with SGP residual correction. Real-world vehicle experiments demonstrate substantial reductions in lateral tracking error and lap time. Compared with MAP and Pure Pursuit (PP), MAP2 reduces the average lateral tracking error by 37.99% and 44.65%, respectively, while reducing average lap time by at least 1.5%.

Comments8 pages, 8 figures, 5 tables

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑