发表机构
UC Berkeley; Cornell Tech（加州大学伯克利分校; 康奈尔科技校区）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
该研究提出学术敏感性概念，设计Wistful探针捕获创造性阅读痕迹，通过16名HCI研究者对比实验，揭示阅读差异及创造性阅读痕迹的反思与研究价值。
AI 中文摘要
研究人员在明确研究目标前往往先进行阅读。随着AI越来越多地介入学术搜索与综合，理解并保存引导早期探索的独特判断变得重要，我们将这些不断演变的倾向称为学术敏感性。为理解好奇心驱动的阅读，我们首先研究了维基百科的“ rabbitholing”（自主浏览行为），随后设计了Wistful——一款用于开放式学术探索的研究探针，可将阅读路径捕获为创造性阅读痕迹。我们邀请16名HCI研究人员（8名初级、8名高级）参与Wistful研究，并与他们的常规工作流程对比。研究发现，研究人员对同一学术领域的处理方式存在差异，熟悉度和个人兴趣决定了他们的研究方向，语义邻近性和学术链接则塑造了他们的路径。这些阅读痕迹使上述差异可见，还能让研究人员回顾并比较各自的路径。我们认为，创造性阅读痕迹可作为反思与交流的载体，也是研究学术敏感性如何通过阅读表达的一种手段。
英文摘要
Researchers often read before they can articulate what they are looking for. As AI increasingly mediates scholarly search and synthesis, understanding and preserving the idiosyncratic judgments guiding early exploration become important. We call these evolving orientations scholarly sensibilities. To understand curiosity-driven reading, we first examined Wikipedia rabbitholing, a self-directed browsing practice, then designed Wistful, a research probe for open-ended scholarly exploration that captures reading paths as creative reading traces. We studied Wistful with 16 HCI researchers---eight junior and eight senior---in comparison with their usual workflows. Researchers approached the same scholarly landscape differently, with familiarity and personal interests shaping what they pursued and semantic proximity and scholarly links shaping their paths. Their traces made these differences visible and let readers revisit and compare their paths. We position creative reading traces as artifacts for reflection and exchange and as a means of studying how scholarly sensibilities are expressed through reading.
