发表机构
University of Massachusetts, Boston; University College Prague; Prague University of Economics and Business（马萨诸塞大学波士顿分校; 布拉格大学学院; 布拉格经济与商业大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本文基于多中心治理外交视角，分析联合国空间资源活动法律问题工作组中各方关于月球资源利用治理的观点与利益，采用定性方法绘制治理替代方案矩阵。
AI 中文摘要
2020年《阿耳忒弥斯协定》出台后，多个国家在空间资源利用方面的国家政策和法律成果的发展步伐加快。该公告还进一步加剧了关于在国际层面明确空间资源利用体制必要性的辩论。2021年，联合国和平利用外层空间委员会法律小组委员会最终批准设立其空间资源活动法律问题工作组。因此，本章基于多中心治理条件下的外交，旨在绘制工作组层面上关于空间资源利用治理的行为体想法和利益多样性图谱。研究过程遵循定性分析方法，并将结果归入空间资源治理的潜在替代方案矩阵中。工作组的现有材料，包括报告和录音，构成了分析中使用的核心经验数据。
英文摘要
The development of national policy and legal outputs toward space resource utilization across several countries accelerated after the introduction of the Artemis Accords in 2020. The announcement also further intensified the debate about the necessity of specifying a regime for using space resources on the international level. In 2021 the Legal Subcommittee of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space finally approved the establishment of its Working Group on Legal Aspects of Space Resource Activities. Therefore, this chapter builds on diplomacy under conditions of polycentric governance and aims to map the diversity of actors' ideas and interests about governance for space resource utilization on the level of the Working Group. The research process follows qualitative analysis methodology and assigns the results into the matrix of prospective alternatives for governing space resources. The available materials of the Working Group including reports and recordings, constitute the core empirical data used in the analysis.
CommentsThe preprint version
Journal refRiordan, N., Machon, M., & Csajkova, L. K. (2026). Space Diplomacy Toward a Legal Regime for Space Resource Activities on the Moon. In Legal Responses to Space Resource Utilisation (pp. 151-178). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore
DOI：10.1007/978-981-95-8864-0_7
