arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2610.07205cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.SI

负责任的高校分析:AI支持下的偏差解读

Responsible Institutional Analytics: Interpreting Bias with AI Support

  • Pompeu Fabra University(庞培法布拉大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

Francielle Marques, Ariel Ortiz-Beltrán, Ishari Amarasinghe, Davinia Hernández-Leo

AI总结:

针对高校分析仪表盘解读易受偏差影响的问题,提出FACTRIA框架结合生成式AI聊天机器人,通过提示用户反思四类偏差因素,定性研究证明该方法能增强上下文感知的负责任解读。

AI中文摘要:

高校分析(IA)仪表盘为高等教育中的决策提供信息,然而数据限制、分析技术的约束以及缺失的上下文信息常常影响其解读。为支持更负责任的IA解读,我们引入了FACTRIA,一个将潜在偏差因素组织为四个领域的框架:分析流程、机构背景、课程层面特征和人口统计。我们将FACTRIA框架用作生成式AI聊天机器人的输入,该机器人旨在提示用户在分析IA时反思这些因素。一项基于四个真实IA案例、涉及利益相关者的定性研究以及转变网络分析表明,该聊天机器人促使参与者认识到被忽视的因素如何影响其初始解读。研究结果显示,将结构化框架与基于AI的指导相结合,可以增强对机构数据进行上下文感知、负责任解读的能力。

英文摘要:

Institutional Analytics (IA) dashboards inform decision-making in higher education, yet data limitations, constraints in analytical techniques, and missing contextual information often affect their interpretation. To support more responsible interpretation of IA, we introduce FACTRIA, a framework that organizes potential biasing factors across four areas: the analytics pipeline, institutional context, course-level characteristics, and demographics. We used the FACTRIA framework as input to a generative-AI chatbot designed to prompt users to reflect on these factors while analyzing IA. A qualitative study with stakeholders, drawing on four authentic IA cases, and a transition network analysis showed that the chatbot prompted participants to recognize how overlooked factors influenced their initial interpretation. Findings indicated that combining a structured framework with AI-based guidance can enhance context-aware, responsible interpretation of institutional data.

补充信息

↑