发表机构
Syracuse University（雪城大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本研究通过现场实验发现，心智感知信念维度性地预测AI伴侣性，且生命意义仅对高存在目的者调节能动性感知与伴侣性的关联。
AI 中文摘要
人类越来越多地与AI伴侣相处，但心智感知（MP）是否先于机器伴侣关系仍未得到检验。在一项现场抽样实验中，参与者在与一个AIC互动并评价其伴侣性之前，收到了赋予心智或否定心智的描述。基线怀疑程度较高；心智启动在一定程度上减少了对联结协调（CC；二元共在）的怀疑，但未减少对幸福交换（EE；自我提升联结）的怀疑。互动前的心智感知信念维度性地预测了伴侣性：能动性心智感知预测了幸福交换潜力，而体验性心智感知预测了联结协调潜力。生命意义调节了能动性心智感知与伴侣性之间的联系，但仅限于那些已具有较高存在目的的人。结果表明，通向伴侣性有两条构念路径——一条通过将AIC视为能动资源，另一条通过将其视为调谐体验者——这两条路径对已经蓬勃发展的个体更为可及。
英文摘要
Humans increasingly keep company with AI companions, yet whether mind perception (MP) precedes machine companionship remains untested. In a field-sampled experiment, participants received mind-attributive or mind-negating descriptions of an AIC before interacting with and rating its companionability. Baseline skepticism was high; minded primes somewhat reduced skepticism for connective coordination (CC; dyadic co-presence) but not eudaimonic exchange (EE; self-elevating links). Pre-interaction MP beliefs predicted companionability dimensionally: Agentic MP predicted EE potential while experiential MP predicted CC potential. Meaning in life moderated the agentic MP-companionability link, but exclusively for those already high in existential purpose. Results suggest two construal pathways to companionability--one through perceiving the AIC as an agent-resource and one through perceiving it as an attuning experiencer--both more accessible to humans already flourishing.
