arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

Axient:杠杆事件市场的规范协议图组合:单一状态权威、原子组合、持久Saga与恰好一次恢复

Axient: Canonical Protocol-Graph Composition for Leveraged Event Markets: Single State Authority, Atomic Composition, Durable Sagas, and Exactly-Once Recovery

Maksym Nechepurenko

arXiv 2610.02834首次发表:更新:

发表机构

Research Department of Devnull FZCO(Devnull FZCO 研究部)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

针对杠杆事件市场缺乏统一执行路径的问题,提出规范协议图组合架构,实现单一状态权威、原子组合与恰好一次恢复,并通过十二项断言验证其安全性与可复现性。

AI 中文摘要

一个模块化的杠杆事件市场协议可以包含各自正确的风险审批、头寸、债务、结算证据、信用池、次级后盾、储备、清算和治理合约,但仍然缺乏一个权威的金融执行路径。本文开发了一个规范协议图,其中每个金融领域都有一个存储权威,组合组件协调转换,而不会重新创建余额、债务、头寸、证据收据、队列、储备、暂停状态或终端场景状态。该架构形式化了原子头寸发起、结算确认的债务Saga、交易者剩余释放、有序的储备-后盾-优先级损失瀑布、损失参与提款队列、能力条件执行、协议范围暂停和定时锁定恢复、确定性部署清单、规范状态投影,以及链确认检查点后的恰好一次重建。我们证明了组合级权威唯一性、原子闭合、损失守恒和优先级、收据幂等结算、法律禁止安全、能力转换安全,以及在明确假设下的无金融重执行恢复。该实现通过十二个父级金融交互断言(FIA-001-FIA-012)进行评估,包括强制性的FIA-011A/B能力子案例。注册的本地队列包含十二个唯一相关的场景记录和84个保留的ACTUAL_EVIDENCE层位置,两次干净物化具有一个字节相同的文件索引,一个确定性严格归档被独立验证器接受,以及一个绑定到该归档的选定有序重放。结果将形式化协议图连接到可复现的证据链,同时保持观察到的工程结果与未来外部操作假设之间的明确界限。

英文摘要

A modular leveraged event-market protocol can contain individually correct contracts for risk approval, positions, debt, settlement evidence, credit pools, junior backstops, reserves, liquidation, and governance while still lacking one authoritative financial execution path. This paper develops a canonical protocol graph in which every financial domain has one storage authority and composition components coordinate transitions without recreating balances, debt, positions, evidence receipts, queues, reserves, pause state, or terminal scenario state. The architecture formalizes atomic position origination, a settlement-confirmed debt saga, trader residual release, an ordered reserve-backstop-Senior loss waterfall, loss-participating withdrawal queues, capability-conditioned execution, protocol-wide pause and timelocked recovery, deterministic deployment manifests, canonical state projection, and exactly-once reconstruction after a chain-confirmed checkpoint. We prove composition-level authority uniqueness, atomic closure, loss conservation and priority, receipt-idempotent settlement, legal no-go safety, capability-transition safety, and no-financial-reexecution recovery under explicit assumptions. The implementation is evaluated through twelve parent Financial Interaction Assertions (FIA-001-FIA-012), including mandatory FIA-011A/B capability subcases. The registered local cohort contains twelve uniquely correlated scenario records and 84 retained ACTUAL_EVIDENCE layer positions, two clean materializations with one byte-identical file index, a deterministic strict archive accepted by a separate verifier, and a selected ordered replay bound to that archive. The result connects the formal protocol graph to a reproducible evidence chain while preserving explicit boundaries between the observed engineering result and future external-operation hypotheses.

Comments24 pages, 3 figures. Also available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=7547363

DOI:10.2139/ssrn.7547363

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑