arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

参与敏感收敛与异步在线学习中的先碎片后收敛模式:基于22门OULAD课程的同调分析

Participation-Sensitive Convergence and the Fragment First, Converge Later Pattern in Asynchronous Online Learning: A Topological Analysis Across 22 OULAD Courses

Hitoshi Inoue, Koichi Yasutake

arXiv 2610.01738首次发表:更新:

发表机构

Nakamura Gakuen University; Hiroshima University(中村学园大学; 广岛大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

本研究通过22门OULAD课程的同调分析,验证β0为参与敏感指标,发现截止日期引发先碎片后收敛模式,为AI学习分析提供结构依据。

AI 中文摘要

异步在线学习在结构上以牺牲社区凝聚力为代价提供时间灵活性:学习社区倾向于碎片化而非凝聚。Zigzag持久同调得到的断开行为簇数量β0作为该结构的队列级指标。两个问题在大规模上仍未验证:(1)表观β0收敛是否反映真实行为对齐还是学习者辍学?(2)评估截止日期是否产生可复现的碎片化-收敛周期?我们在全部22门OULAD课程(N>22,000;857个周对)中解决这两个问题。β0的变化与活跃学习者变化强烈共变(合并r=0.387;每课程中位数r_delta=0.459,20/22门课程),将β0识别为参与敏感指标:β0和活跃学习者计数对截止日期事件共同响应而非因果关系。截止日期在82.6%的评估中产生碎片化,完整先碎片后收敛(FFCL)周期占60.2%。三阶段分析确认结构碎片化为主导长期轨迹(90.9%的课程),受课程结构调节。这些发现确立β0为参与敏感结构指标,对AI增强学习分析设计有直接影响。

英文摘要

Asynchronous online learning offers temporal flexibility at a structural cost: learning communities tend to fragment rather than cohere. $β_0$, the number of disconnected behavioral clusters from Zigzag Persistent Homology, serves as a cohort-level indicator of this structure. Two questions remained unverified at scale: (1) does apparent $β_0$ convergence reflect genuine behavioral alignment or learner dropout? and (2) do assessment deadlines produce reproducible fragmentation-convergence cycles? We address both across all 22 OULAD courses (N > 22,000; 857 week-pairs). Changes in $β_0$ strongly co-vary with active learner changes (pooled r = 0.387; median per-course r_delta = 0.459, 20/22 courses), identifying $β_0$ as a participation-sensitive indicator: $β_0$ and active learner counts co-respond to deadline events rather than one causing the other. Deadlines produced fragmentation in 82.6% of assessments and the full Fragment First, Converge Later (FFCL) cycle in 60.2%. 3-phase analysis confirmed structural fragmentation as the dominant long-term trajectory (90.9% of courses), moderated by curriculum structure. These findings establish $β_0$ as a participation-sensitive structural indicator with direct implications for AI-augmented learning analytics design.

CommentsAuthor's version, posted under the non-commercial rights retained in the APSCE copyright transfer agreement

Journal refProceedings of ICLEA 2026: 2nd International Conference on Learning Evidence and Analytics, Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, 2026

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑