arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

变分量子电路中的零温与无限温阻尼:特征尺度、采样成本与框架规范

Zero- Versus Infinite-Temperature Damping in Variational Quantum Circuits: Feature Scale, Sampling Cost, and Frame Gauge

Vu-Quoc-Minh Nguyen, Tuan-Vu Truong, Hoang-Long Nguyen, Trung-Khanh Le

arXiv 2610.01466首次发表:更新:

发表机构

Faculty of Electronics and Telecommunications, University of Science, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM); Identity Quantum Computing JSC(越南国家大学胡志明市科学大学电子与电信学院; Identity量子计算股份公司)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

该研究比较变分量子电路中零温振幅阻尼与其无限温泡利twirl,隔离零温偏置对特征尺度的影响,发现可训练输出尺度可消除精度差异但增加测量采样成本,并指出阻尼方向在特定条件下为规范。

AI 中文摘要

振幅阻尼(AD)的泡利twirl是无限温度下的广义振幅阻尼:它保留了AD的收缩性,但去除了其非幺正项,因此在变分电路中比较两者可以隔离零温偏置,该偏置主要通过特征尺度起作用。对于随机参数,AD下的特征会落在一个底板上,在强阻尼下该底板由最后一层决定,具有闭式形式,且在固定$T_1$下随温度按$\tanh(\hbar\omega/2k_BT)$下降;在twirl下,特征每层按常数因子收缩,最多可达八比特。可训练的输出尺度消除了大部分由此产生的精度差异,在我们的模拟中,AD最多比其twirl高出约三个百分点;被消除的差异以测量射击成本的形式重新出现:以每幅图像$10^3$次射击进行训练和测试,在$p=0.3$下,四比特分类器在AD下的精度保持在无噪声精度的1.5个百分点以内,而twirled分类器损失高达33。在较弱阻尼下,分离深度大致按$(np)^{-1}\ln(1/p)$增长。当阻尼跟随完全纠缠层且电路边界可训练时,阻尼方向是一个规范;在特征值求解器中,它在分解的两比特门内变得物理化。

英文摘要

The Pauli twirl of amplitude damping (AD) is generalized amplitude damping at infinite temperature: it keeps the contraction of AD and removes its non-unital term, so comparing the two in variational circuits isolates the zero-temperature bias, which acts mainly through the scale of the features. For random parameters, features under AD settle on a floor, which at strong damping is set by the last layer, has a closed form, and at fixed $T_1$ falls with temperature as $\tanh(\hbarω/2k_BT)$; under the twirls they shrink by a constant factor per layer, up to eight qubits. A trainable output scale removes most of the resulting accuracy differences, leaving AD ahead of its twirls by at most about three percentage points in our simulations; what it removes reappears as a cost in measurement shots: trained and tested with $10^3$ shots per image, a four-qubit classifier under AD at $p=0.3$ stays within 1.5 points of noiseless accuracy, while the twirled classifiers lose up to 33. At weaker damping the separation depth grows roughly as $(np)^{-1}\ln(1/p)$. The damping direction is a gauge when the damping follows complete entangling layers and the circuit boundaries are trainable; in an eigensolver it becomes physical inside a decomposed two-qubit gate.

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑