AI中介决策环境中的高管判断：形成、资格损耗与授权的过程理论
Executive Judgement in AI-Mediated Decision-Making Environments: A Process Theory of Formation, Qualification Attrition and Authorisation
查看机构详情
- University of Huddersfield（哈德斯菲尔德大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文提出过程理论，解释AI中介决策中资格损耗与形成—授权差距如何导致高管判断失败，并通过四维度治理框架降低认知与问责风险。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
生成式人工智能能够为高管判断的形成提供表征、备选方案和评估依据。现有研究已解释了混合认知、依赖、管理能动性和问责制等重要方面。本文提出一个更聚焦的过程性挑战：当既有的运营假设、不确定性或依赖关系在授权之前被丢失或转化时，即使局部胜任的人类与AI贡献，仍可能导致组织承诺缺乏充分依据。本文提出“资格损耗”作为此类具有认知后果的内容在连续转化中被削弱的过程，并定义“形成—授权差距”为有依据承诺所需的基础与授权角色仍可获取、可理解且可质疑的基础之间的差异。高管判断治理通过四个维度界定：边界设定、解释性挑战、依赖校准以及带有可答责性的授权。四个命题将转化、资格损耗和治理安排与认知风险、问责风险及判断质量联系起来。本文的贡献在于提出一个整合性的过程理论，说明即使个体贡献、局部依赖决策和正式问责安排看似胜任，分布式判断形成仍可能作为整体组合而失败。
英文摘要
Generative artificial intelligence can contribute to the representations, alternatives and evaluations through which executive judgements are formed. Existing research already explains important aspects of hybrid cognition, reliance, managerial agency and accountability. This article develops a narrower process challenge: locally competent human and AI contributions can still culminate in an inadequately warranted organisational commitment when established operational assumptions, uncertainties or dependencies are lost or transformed before authorisation. It proposes qualification attrition as the process through which such epistemically consequential content is weakened across successive transformations, and a formation--authorisation gap as the resulting discrepancy between the grounds required for warranted commitment and those that remain accessible, intelligible and challengeable to the authorising role. Executive judgement governance is defined through four dimensions: boundary setting, interpretive challenge, reliance calibration, and authorisation with answerability. Four propositions connect transformation, qualification attrition and governance arrangements to epistemic risk, accountability risk and judgement quality. The contribution is an integrative process theory of how distributed judgement formation can fail as a composition even where individual contributions, local reliance decisions and formal accountability arrangements appear competent.
