arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

语义地图共享与能力感知覆盖规划用于AI原生6G机器人协同

Semantic Map Sharing and Capability-Aware Coverage Planning for AI-Native 6G Robotic Coordination

Abdulqader Dhafer, Qi Wang, Zhou Daniel Hao

arXiv 2609.37666首次发表:更新:

发表机构

University of Leicester(莱斯特大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

针对搜索救援中异构机器人覆盖规划问题,提出边缘中心语义感知框架,通过语义网格地图共享和能力感知路径分配,实现91.5%覆盖率且无不可行分配,并大幅降低通信载荷。

AI 中文摘要

搜索与救援(SAR)行动日益部署由空中和地面机器人组成的异构团队。然而,传统覆盖方法通常不能将感知到的地形转化为平台特定的可达性,而连续图像交换则带来高昂的通信成本。我们提出了一种边缘中心、语义感知的覆盖规划框架,该框架集成了空中地形感知、机器人特定可通行性推理和载荷高效的语义状态共享。空中观测被转换为紧凑的语义网格地图,从而实现受可达性约束的区域分解和能力感知的覆盖路径,这些路径仅分配每个机器人能力档案所允许的区域。由此产生的感知-共享-规划循环将语义修正反馈到可通行性推理和重新规划中,形成一种应用级机制,其动机源于为AI原生6G网络设想的AI赋能目标导向通信。在高更新场景下,传输语义修正相比周期性全地图共享可将应用载荷减少约82倍。在匹配的基准场景中,所提出的方法实现了91.5%的覆盖率且无能力不可行分配,而LS-MCPP的覆盖率为78.8%,能力不可行分配率为21.5%。语义修正更新共享的规划状态,无需重复传输完整地图。

英文摘要

Search and Rescue (SAR) operations increasingly deploy heterogeneous teams of aerial and ground robots. However, conventional coverage methods typically do not translate perceived terrain into platform-specific reachability, while continuous image exchange imposes a high communication cost. We propose an edge-centric, semantic-aware coverage planning framework that integrates aerial terrain perception, robot-specific traversability reasoning, and payload-efficient semantic state sharing. Aerial observations are converted into compact semantic grid maps, enabling reachability-constrained area decomposition and capability-aware coverage paths that assign only regions admitted by each robot's capability profile. The resulting perception-sharing-planning loop feeds semantic corrections into traversability reasoning and replanning, forming an application-level mechanism motivated by AI-enabled goal-oriented communication envisioned for AI-native 6G networks. For the high-update case, transmitting semantic corrections reduces the application payload by a factor of approximately $82$ relative to periodic full-map sharing. Across matched benchmark scenarios, the proposed method achieved $91.5\%$ coverage with no capability-infeasible allocations, compared with $78.8\%$ coverage and a $21.5\%$ capability-infeasible allocation rate for LS-MCPP. Semantic corrections update the shared planning state without requiring repeated transmission of the complete map.

CommentsAn alternative version of this work was accepted for presentation at IEEE CSCN 2026

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑