发表机构
College of Science, Northwest A & F University(西北农林科技大学理学院)
机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本文构建整合社会行为、生态资源与制度调控的三元协同进化系统,通过平衡与稳定性分析揭示可持续运行状态及“打击—反弹”政策陷阱,为治理失败提供系统级解释。
AI 中文摘要
为应对高成本社会合作下的公地困境,本文构建了一个整合社会行为、生态资源动态与制度调控的三元协同进化系统。制度干预被建模为一种自适应反馈机制,其强度响应于偏离预设合作与生态目标的程度。通过平衡分析、稳定性分析和相空间刻画,我们识别了耦合系统的主要运行机制与转变机制。结果表明,该系统存在一个可持续的运行平衡,其中合作、生态资源与制度调控共存。我们进一步确立了理想运行状态的结构稳定性,该状态以完全合作、资源峰值可用性和持续最小干预为特征。除这些稳定机制外,系统还表现出双稳态和极限环,表明不同的初始条件和参数配置可能产生替代性长期结果。这些非线性机制产生了一种持续的“打击—反弹”政策陷阱,其中强化的干预暂时改善合作与资源状况,但最终导致周期性振荡并阻碍系统范围的共识。所提出的框架提供了治理失败的系统级解释,并为设计耦合人类—环境系统中的自适应制度调控提供了分析性见解。
英文摘要
To address commons dilemmas under costly social cooperation, this paper develops a tripartite coevolutionary system that integrates social behavior, ecological resource dynamics, and institutional regulation. Institutional intervention is modeled as an adaptive feedback mechanism whose intensity responds to deviations from prescribed cooperation and ecological targets. Through equilibrium analysis, stability analysis, and phase space characterization, we identify the principal operating regimes and transition mechanisms of the coupled system. The results show that the system admits a sustainable operating equilibrium in which cooperation, ecological resources, and institutional regulation coexist. We further establish the structural stability of a desirable operating state characterized by full cooperation, peak resource availability, and persistently minimal intervention. In addition to these stable regimes, the system exhibits bistability and limit cycles, indicating that alternative long term outcomes may arise from different initial conditions and parameter configurations. These nonlinear mechanisms generate a persistent crackdown rebound policy trap, in which intensified intervention temporarily improves cooperation and resource conditions but eventually produces recurrent oscillations and prevents system wide consensus. The proposed framework provides a system level explanation of governance failure and offers analytical insights for designing adaptive institutional regulation in coupled human environment systems.