arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

学习证明,而非仅仅作答:基于形式化验证的强化学习用于自然语言逻辑推理

Learning to Prove, Not Just to Answer: Reinforcement Learning from Formal Verification for Natural-Language Logical Reasoning

Qili Zhang, Qianren Mao, Hanze Cai, Kaiming Zhao, Yuening He, Xihan Lei, Yashuo Luo, Hanwen Hao, Yutong Gu, Likang Xiao, Zhijun Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Haoyi Zhou, Jianxin Li

arXiv 2609.37203首次发表:更新:

发表机构

Zhongguancun Laboratory; Beihang University; Nanyang Technological University; Hong Kong Polytechnic University(中关村实验室; 北京航空航天大学; 南洋理工大学; 香港理工大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

针对自然语言逻辑推理中证明难以机器验证的问题,提出基于形式化验证的强化学习框架Proof-R1,通过UNSAT验证和依赖闭包对齐奖励,提升答案准确性与推理过程可验证性。

AI 中文摘要

大型语言模型(LLMs)正越来越多地被部署用于自然语言逻辑推理,在这种推理中,最终答案易于检查,但其背后的证明却不易验证。在自然语言逻辑推理中,中间结论应遵循其前提,且由此产生的推导应支持最终答案。现有方法缺乏对中间结论和答案支持性证明依赖的机器可检查验证,因此可能将奖励归于无效或与答案无关的步骤。我们提出Proof-R1,一种基于形式化验证的强化学习框架,用于训练LLMs为自然语言逻辑推理构建可验证的证明。Proof-R1仅当相应的推理动作通过基于UNSAT的机器可检查形式化验证满足证明义务时,才将生成的结论纳入已验证的证明状态。Proof-R1还恢复答案支持的依赖闭包,以追踪最终答案的证明结构,并将结果奖励与证明依赖对齐。实验表明,Proof-R1在三个逻辑推理基准和四个骨干模型上提高了答案准确性,并在推理过程可验证性方面优于无训练代理和基于训练的方法。

英文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for natural-language logical reasoning, where the final answer is easy to check but the proof behind it is not. In natural-language logical reasoning, an intermediate conclusion should follow from its premises, and the resulting derivation should support the final answer. Existing methods lack machine-checkable verification of intermediate conclusions and answer-supporting proof dependencies, so they may assign credit to invalid or answer-irrelevant steps. We propose Proof-R1, an RL framework from formal verification that trains LLMs to construct verifiable proofs for natural-language logical reasoning. Proof-R1 admits a generated conclusion into the verified proof state only when the corresponding reasoning action satisfies the proof obligations through UNSAT-based machine-checkable formal verification. Proof-R1 also recovers the answer-supporting dependency closure to trace the proof structure of the final answer and align outcome credit with the proof dependencies. Experiments demonstrate that Proof-R1 improves answer accuracy across three logical reasoning benchmarks and four backbone models and outperforms training-free agents and training-based methods in terms of reasoning-process verifiability.

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑