发表机构
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST); University of Luxembourg（卢森堡科学技术研究院（LIST）; 卢森堡大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本文针对AI监管沙盒中社会技术意义建构的空白，设计了一种边界协商工件，通过研究型设计迭代开发协作工具，作为技术支柱促进利益相关者协作评估，并报告设计见解。
AI 中文摘要
AI系统能力的快速、不可预测的进步促使监管机构采取适应性和实验性的政策制定方法。监管沙盒在其他领域已确立为平衡监管与创新的工具，被视为AI监管的解决方案。然而，现有分析大多聚焦于AI监管沙盒（AIRSes）的法律和制度设计。由于法律框架将社会技术解释留给利益相关者，这造成了在实现AIRS目的所需的意义建构方面的空白。在本文中，我们通过设计一种边界协商工件来调解AIRSes中的意义，以应对这一挑战。通过研究型设计（Research-through-Design），我们迭代开发了一个工具，为不同利益相关者提供协作进行AI评估的界面。然后，我们将其定位为已建立AIRS框架中的技术支柱，构建相关利益相关者的协作式意义建构。我们进一步报告了设计过程中获得的见解，并将定性评估留待未来工作。
英文摘要
The rapid, unpredictable advancements in AI system capabilities has seen regulators take adaptive and experimental approaches to policymaking. Established in other domains as instruments balancing regulation with innovation, regulatory sandboxes are seen as solutions for AI regulation. However, analyses mostly focus on the legal and institutional design of AI Regulatory Sandboxes (AIRSes). With the legal framework leaving the socio-technical interpretation to stakeholders, this creates a gap on the sense-making required to fulfill the AIRS purpose. In this paper, we approach this by designing a Boundary Negotiating Artifact as a way to mediate meaning in AIRSes. Through Research-through-Design we iteratively develop a tool, providing an interface for the different stakeholders to collaborate in AI assessment. We then position it as technical backbone in established AIRS frameworks, structuring the collaborative sense-making of the involved stakeholders. We further report the insights gained from our design process leaving the qualitative evaluation for future work.
