arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2609.36804cs.CLcs.AI

VAA-CSEC:用于中文语义纠错的投票引导优势分配

VAA-CSEC: Vote-guided Advantage Allocation for Chinese Semantic Error Correction

Yitong Han, Nankai Lin, Juan Luo, Hongyan Wu, Lianxi Wang, Shengyi Jiang

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

针对中文语义纠错中过度纠正及CoT与自一致性解码交互不清的问题,提出VAA-CSEC多阶段框架,结合CoT蒸馏、SFT、RL和自一致性解码,并引入GLPO对齐训练与推理目标,在CSED-C和NaSGEC-Exam上取得最优F0.5。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

中文语义纠错(CSEC)旨在处理中文文本中的语义错误,这类错误通常比拼写错误和语法错误更为微妙和复杂,但相关研究仍相对不足。现有基于大语言模型(LLM)的方法在此任务中面临两个反复出现的障碍:过度纠正,以及思维链(CoT)推理与自一致性解码之间交互不清晰,导致CoT带来的益处无法可靠地传递给最终纠正结果。我们提出用于CSEC的投票引导优势分配(VAA-CSEC),这是一个多阶段框架,结合了CoT蒸馏、监督微调(SFT)、强化学习(RL)和自一致性解码。在RL阶段,我们设计了一个与CSEC最小编辑原则直接对齐的任务特定奖励函数。我们进一步引入组级相对策略优化(GLPO),该优化根据单个rollout奖励与投票聚合的组奖励之间的差值重新分配GRPO优势,使RL训练目标与推理时使用的自一致性目标对齐。在CSED-C和NaSGEC-Exam上的实验表明,VAA-CSEC在CSED-C上以47.72%的F0.5值超越了所有基于LLM的基线,在所有方法中实现了最高的42.15%召回率,并在NaSGEC-Exam上以41.55%的F0.5值创下了新的最先进水平。

英文摘要

Chinese Semantic Error Correction (CSEC) targets semantic errors in Chinese text, which are typically more subtle and complex than spelling and grammatical errors but remain relatively underexplored. Existing LLM-based approaches face two recurring obstacles in this task: over-correction, and unclear interaction between Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and self-consistency decoding, such that the benefits brought by CoT cannot be reliably transferred to final corrections. We propose Vote-guided Advantage Allocation for CSEC (VAA-CSEC), a multi-stage framework that combines CoT distillation, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Reinforcement Learning (RL) and self-consistency decoding. During RL, we design a task-specific reward function that directly aligned with the minimal-editing principle of CSEC. We further introduce Group-Level Relative Policy Optimization (GLPO), which reallocates GRPO advantages according to the margin between individual rollout rewards and the vote-aggregated group reward, aligning the RL training objective with the self-consistency objective used at inference time. Experiments on CSED-C and NaSGEC-Exam show that VAA-CSEC outperforms all LLM-based baselines on CSED-C with an F0.5 of 47.72%, achieves the highest recall of 42.15% among all methods, and establishes a new state of the art of 41.55% F0.5 on NaSGEC-Exam.

发表机构

  • Guangdong University of Foreign Studies(广东外语外贸大学)
  • National University of Defense Technology(国防科技大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

补充信息

↑