发表机构
University of Iowa（爱荷华大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本研究针对编码智能体访问研究代码的知识产权保护问题，提出通过容器、权限规则和沙箱分类十五条读取路径，发现三者均无法区分读取程序，凸显了现有隔离机制的局限。
AI 中文摘要
编译器必须读取基于物理的求解器无法构建所必需的模块；而编码智能体则不得读取该知识产权。该框架并未内置这一规则。我们针对容器、权限规则和沙箱对十五条读取路径进行了分类。这三者均无法判断是哪个程序在进行读取。
英文摘要
The compiler must read modules a physics-based solver cannot build without; the coding agent must not read that intellectual property. The harness does not ship that rule. We classified fifteen read routes against a container, permission rules and a sandbox. None of the three can tell which program is reading.
Comments6 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. Ancillary files: the classification and history scripts with their outputs
