“黑镜”？：公众对AI驱动的生活记录的意义建构
"Black Mirror?": Public Sensemaking of AI-Powered Lifelogging
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究以Looki L1为载体，通过分析5053条中英文社交媒体评论，结合主题聚类与归纳分析，探究公众对AI生活记录设备的意义建构，发现中英文语境下用户认知存在差异。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
AI驱动的生活记录可穿戴设备正作为一类新型消费设备兴起，可将日常体验转化为可搜索、由AI策展的记忆档案。我们以Looki L1为实证研究载体，研究这类系统刚进入市场时早期公众对其的意义建构。通过分析大规模中英文社交媒体话语（N=5053条评论），我们结合主题聚类与归纳式主题分析，探究用户如何解读AI介导的记忆所带来的社会、道德与政治影响。在不同语境中，用户都提及反乌托邦式监控想象，表达对隐私的无奈与旁观者担忧，并围绕辅助价值与消费逻辑展开争论。英文评论更多从人际权力、证据用途与黑客焦虑角度构建这类设备的认知框架，而中文评论更常突出劳动剥削、治理监控与技术必然性。
英文摘要
AI-powered lifelogging wearables are emerging as a new class of consumer devices that transform everyday experience into searchable, AI-curated memory archives. We study early public sensemaking around these systems at the moment of their market entry, using the Looki L1 as an empirical lens. Analysing large-scale Chinese-language and English-language social media discourse (N = 5,053 comments), we combine topic clustering with inductive thematic analysis to examine how users interpret the social, moral, and political implications of AI-mediated memory. Across contexts, users reference dystopian surveillance imaginaries, express privacy resignation and bystander concerns, and debate assistive value alongside consumer logics. English-language comments more often framed these devices through interpersonal power, evidentiary use, and hacking anxieties, while Chinese-language comments more often foregrounded labour exploitation, governance surveillance, and technological inevitability.
发表机构
- National University of Singapore（新加坡国立大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
