发表机构
Iran University of Art（伊朗艺术学院）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
该研究调查443名设计师，发现AI采用在双钻工作流中呈部分参与模式，工具选择随阶段变化，采用者与非采用者仅在感知有用性上存在差异。
AI 中文摘要
设计师采用AI的速度快于为其构建的工具所能跟上的速度。这项对来自43个国家的443名设计师进行的调查，是同类中首批按阶段细分的研究之一，考察了在双钻工作流（发现、定义、开发、交付）四个阶段中报告的AI使用情况。79.7%的设计师报告在至少一个阶段确认使用了AI，但参与通常是部分的，平均覆盖4个阶段中的2.89个，采用者保留最早阶段而放弃最后阶段。工具选择跟随每个阶段的主导活动：对话式工具驱动发现和定义阶段，AI原生图像生成主导开发阶段，而交付阶段显示出混合特征。AI原生和嵌入式AI的使用在不同阶段达到峰值，指向人机协作的两种不同模式：从零生成与在现有软件中精炼。使用强度下降是因为参与的设计师减少，而非使用规模缩减。采用者与非采用者在一个维度上存在差异：感知有用性。
英文摘要
Designers are adopting AI faster than the tools built for them can keep up. This survey of 443 designers across 43 countries, among the first phase-disaggregated accounts of its kind, examined reported AI use across the four phases of the Double Diamond workflow (Discover, Define, Develop, Deliver). 79.7 percent reported confirmed AI use in at least one phase, but engagement was typically partial, spanning a mean of 2.89 of 4 phases, with adopters retaining the earliest phases and dropping the latest. Tool choice tracked each phase's dominant activity: conversational tools drove Discover and Define, AI-native image generation took over Develop, and Deliver showed a hybrid profile. AI-native and embedded AI use peaked in different phases, pointing to two distinct modes of human-AI collaboration: generating from scratch versus refining within existing software. Use intensity declined through fewer designers engaging, not scaled-back use. Adopters and non-adopters differed on one dimension: perceived usefulness.
