多实验室企业：多模型AI采用中的治理、FinOps与遥测挑战
The Multi-Lab Enterprise: Governance, FinOps, and Telemetry Challenges of Multi-Model AI Adoption
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文揭示多模型AI采用的结构性特征，提出治理、FinOps和遥测三大挑战，并倡导构建跨提供商的企业AI控制平面。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
企业并非只选择一家前沿AI提供商；它们对所有提供商都进行许可授权。截至2026年初，全球2000强企业中有81%运行三个或更多模型家族，而OpenAI、Anthropic和Google Gemini合计约占企业LLM使用量和支出的88%至89%。本文利用调查数据、交易数据、提供商披露以及金融、法律、咨询、医疗、生命科学、零售和政府领域的案例研究，表明多实验室许可是市场的一个结构性特征，其驱动力是持久的、针对特定任务的模型差异化，而非等待商品化的过渡阶段。这种结构产生了三个运营问题。治理碎片化（P1）：异构的供应商安全态势、文档和合规面必须在重叠的监管框架下进行协调，同时影子AI泛滥。FinOps失效（P2）：基于令牌、行为驱动的消费使预算编制失效。在过去一年中，79%的企业超支了AI预算，其中FinOps成熟的组织平均超支30.9%，且不存在标准化的跨提供商支出单位。遥测碎片化（P3）：每个实验室通过不兼容的控制台、API和指标定义暴露采用和成本数据，迫使采用定制的统一层。我们梳理了新兴的应对措施，包括LLM网关、可观测性平台以及Tokenomics Foundation的FOCUS扩展。然后，我们开发了一个五指标框架来评估API和代理成本消耗，并提供了一个工作示例，其中每次尝试最便宜的模型在每项成功任务中却是最昂贵的。我们得出结论，P1、P2和P3反映了一个缺失的抽象：跨提供商的企业AI控制平面。
英文摘要
Enterprises are not choosing a single frontier AI provider; they are licensing all of them. As of early 2026, 81% of Global 2000 enterprises run three or more model families, and OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini together account for roughly 88 to 89% of enterprise LLM usage and spend. Drawing on survey data, transaction data, provider disclosures, and case studies across finance, legal, consulting, healthcare, life sciences, retail, and government, this paper shows that multi-lab licensing is a structural feature of the market, driven by durable task-specific model differentiation rather than a transitional phase awaiting commoditization. This structure creates three operational problems. Governance fragmentation (P1): heterogeneous vendor security postures, documentation, and compliance surfaces must be reconciled across overlapping regulatory frameworks while shadow AI proliferates. FinOps breakdown (P2): token-based, behavior-driven consumption defeats budgeting. In the past year, 79% of enterprises overran AI budgets, with FinOps-mature organizations overshooting by a mean of 30.9%, and no standardized cross-provider unit of spend exists. Telemetry fragmentation (P3): each lab exposes adoption and cost data through incompatible consoles, APIs, and metric definitions, forcing bespoke unification layers. We map the emerging responses, including LLM gateways, observability platforms, and the Tokenomics Foundation's FOCUS extension. We then develop a five-metric framework for evaluating API and agent cost burn, with a worked example where the cheapest model per attempt is the most expensive per successful task. We conclude that P1, P2, and P3 reflect one missing abstraction: a cross-provider enterprise AI control plane.
发表机构
- AIx4All, LLC（AIx4All有限责任公司）
- HCLTech（HCL科技）
- UCB（巴西利亚大学）
- Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute（斯坦利·曼恩儿童研究所）
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago（芝加哥安与罗伯特·H·卢瑞儿童医院）
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine（西北大学菲因伯格医学院）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
