拆除脚手架的代价：麦克斯韦关于安培的论述，多年后竟被施加于他自身
The Price of Removing the Scaffolding: Maxwell wrote something about Ampère that years later would be done to him
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文基于原始文献，考察麦克斯韦理论中被当作“脚手架”而移除的部分及其代价，并指出麦克斯韦遗漏了安培工作中的模板痕迹，这些内容后来被证明仍需恢复。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
在物理学史上，“脚手架”这一名称被用来指代那些曾用于构建理论、而后因被认为不再需要而被移除的东西。本文依据原始文献，记录了当这种方法被应用于麦克斯韦理论时，该理论付出了怎样的代价：从中移除了什么，由谁移除，依据何种论证，以及多年后为何必须将其恢复，因为人们最终认识到它仍然是必需的。文章还记载了麦克斯韦本人在安培的工作中所遗漏的东西，即他所称的“脚手架的痕迹”：安培本人用来赋予其工作以形态的模板。
英文摘要
In the history of physics, the name scaffolding has been given to whatever served to raise a theory and is afterwards removed because, it is said, it is no longer needed. This article documents, from the originals, what it cost Maxwell's theory when that method was applied to it: what was removed from it, who did it, with what argument, and how over the years it had to be recovered because it was understood that it was needed after all. It also records what Maxwell himself missed in Ampère, what he calls the traces of the scaffolding: the template with which Ampère himself had given shape to his work.
