发表机构
King Saud University; Ibb University（沙特国王大学; 伊卜大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本研究通过分析X和Facebook上的阿拉伯语帖子，发现话语类别与平台均显著影响标准阿拉伯语与口语阿拉伯语的选择，数字时代重塑而非消除双重语体边界。
AI 中文摘要
本研究突显了标准阿拉伯语（SA；高变体）与口语阿拉伯语（CA；低变体）在X和Facebook上的分布情况。通过Python收集了16754条公开帖子，其中10000条被保留为净数据集。帖子被分类为7个话语类别：政治、技术、科学、商业、文化、娱乐和体育。双变量分析，包括卡方检验和Cramer's V（CV），检验了平台、话语类别和双重语体选择之间的关联，而带有平台×话语类别交互项的二元逻辑回归则检验了这些关联是否因平台而异。研究发现，在X上，话语类别与双重语体选择之间存在显著关联，卡方（6，N=5000）=600.35，p<.001，CV=.347；在Facebook上，卡方（6，N=5000）=1249.52，p<.001，CV=.500。跨平台来看，平台也与双重语体选择相关，卡方（1，N=10000）=262.16，p<.001，CV=.162。二元逻辑回归进一步显示，在政治参考类别中，X上使用SA的几率高于Facebook（OR=1.31，p=.0028），且文化与平台交互项显著（OR=2.65），娱乐（OR=6.34），体育（OR=26.71），科学（OR=0.41），技术（OR=0.71）。研究得出结论，SA和CA的双重语体使用丰富了数字话语研究，揭示了数字时代重塑但并未侵蚀双重语体边界，反而催生了重构的数字双重语体。
英文摘要
This study highlights the distribution of Standard Arabic (SA; H(igh) variety) and Colloquial Arabic (CA; L(ow) variety) across X and Facebook. 16754 public posts were collected via Python, with 10000 retained as the net dataset. Posts were classified into 7 discourse categories: *politics, technology, science, business, culture, fun,* and *sports*. Bivariate analyses, including Chi-square tests and Cramer's V (CV), examined associations among platform, discourse category, and diglossic choice, while binary logistic regression with Platform x Discourse Category interactions tested whether these associations varied across platforms. Findings reveal that there are significant associations between discourse category and diglossic choice on X, chi-square(6, *N* = 5000) = 600.35, p < .001, CV = .347, and Facebook, chi-square(6, N = 5000) = 1249.52, p < .001, CV = .500. Across platforms, platform was also associated with diglossic choice, chi-square(1, N = 10000) = 262.16, p < .001, CV = .162. Binary logistic regression further shows higher odds of SA use on X than Facebook in the political reference category (*OR* = 1.31, p = .0028), with significant platform-by-domain interactions for Culture (OR = 2.65), Fun (*OR* = 6.34), Sports (*OR* = 26.71), Science (OR = 0.41), and Technology (OR = 0.71). The study concludes that the diglossic use of SA and CA contributes to the growing body of research on digital discourse, unveiling that the digital age reshapes but does not erode diglossic boundaries, giving rise instead to a reconfigured digital diglossia.
Comments7 Tables, 3 Figures
