发表机构
Birkbeck College, University of London（伦敦大学伯贝克学院）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本文提出接受与拒绝是表达相反极性的经典言语行为，通过双边模型和否定关系系统表示，并区分拒绝与否定，引入一致性与不一致性以阐明其自反性联系。
AI 中文摘要
在本文中，我们认为接受与拒绝是经典的言语行为，它们表达了对命题内容的两种相反极性立场，并且可以在一个经典勾勒的双边形式模型中被系统地表示。接受占据正极，由正A表示，而拒绝占据负极，由负A表示。它们的经典关系由否定来中介，因为对A的接受对应于对否定A的拒绝，而对A的拒绝对应于对否定A的接受，表示为正A当且仅当负否定A，以及负A当且仅当正否定A。一致性与不一致性被引入作为补充概念，以阐明这种关系及其与自反性的联系。本文的另一个成果是对拒绝与否定的方法论区分，即拒绝表达了对A的负极性，而否定则作用于命题内容。
英文摘要
In this paper, we argue that acceptance and rejection are classical speech acts that express two opposite polar positions toward propositional content and can be systematically represented within a classically outlined bilateral formal model. Acceptance occupies the positive pole, represented by positive A, whereas rejection occupies the negative pole, represented by minus A. Their classical relationship is mediated by negation because acceptance of A corresponds to rejection of negation A, while rejection of A corresponds to acceptance of negation A, represented by positive A iff minus negation A and minus A iff positive negation A. Coherency and incoherency are introduced as supplementary notions to clarify this relationship and its connection with reflexivity. A further result of the manuscript is the methodical distinction between rejection and negation namely, rejection expresses negative polarity toward A, whereas negation operates upon propositional content.
Comments11 Pages
