arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2609.24283astro-ph.EP

暗彗星 1998 KY$_{26}$ 的火卫一(Phobos 1)假说可行性研究

Feasibility of the Phobos 1 Hypothesis for Dark Comet 1998 KY$_{26}$

Adam Hibberd, Adam Crowl, Abraham Loeb

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

本研究通过分析光变曲线和天体测量数据,验证了暗彗星 1998 KY$_{26}$ 可能是失踪的苏联火卫一探测器,结果高度吻合且无矛盾证据,支持该假说。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

小行星 1998 KY$_{26}$ 自 1998 年 5 月 28 日被发现后不久,直至 2020 年和 2024 年的两次近距离回归,一直受到光学和雷达的深入观测。此前的研究已对该天体进行了精确表征,包括周期为 5.3516 $\pm$ 0.0001 分钟的异常快速自转、直径 11 $\pm$ 2 米以及约 0.52 的高反照率。此外,在未探测到明显气体或尘埃抛射的情况下,存在显著的非引力加速度(NGAs),这促成了其“暗彗星”的分类,日本宇宙航空研究开发机构(JAXA)已重新调整其隼鸟2号$\sharp$(Hayabusa2$\sharp$)航天器任务,计划于 2031 年与目标交会。我们追踪了指向该天体可能实际上是失踪的苏联火卫一(Phobos 1)探测器的天体动力学证据,并分析了与 1998 KY$_{26}$ 相关的各种测光和天体测量数据,以进一步研究该假说的可行性。我们发现,火卫一航天器的一阶近似模型与目标的 8 条光变曲线高度吻合;此外,将非引力加速度建模为圆柱体或太阳能电池板上的太阳辐射压(SRP),可使 260 个天体测量和雷达测量数据的残差显著降低约 11%。尽管此类研究无法得出最终结论,但我们的结果有力支持了火卫一假说,且未发现明显的矛盾证据。基于火卫一假说,由测光计算得到的黄道 J2000 坐标系中的自转极轴为 $(\lambda,\beta)=({151^{+1}_{-2}}^{\circ},{+11^{+12}_{- 3}}^{\circ})$,其中所列范围代表约 68.3% 的置信水平。

英文摘要

The asteroid 1998 KY$_{26}$ has been the subject of thorough observation, both optical and radar, from shortly following its discovery on 28 May 1998, through 2 further close apparitions in 2020 and 2024. This has previously allowed an accurate characterization of the object, including an unusually rapid spin-rate with period 5.3516 $\pm$ 0.0001 minutes, a diameter of 11 $\pm$ 2 m, and a high albedo of $\sim{0.52}$. Furthermore, the presence of significant nongravitational accelerations (NGAs), with no detectable shedding of gas or dust, has stimulated the 'dark comet' categorization, with JAXA repurposing their Hayabusa2$\sharp$ spacecraft to rendezvous with the object in 2031. We follow-up the astrodynamical evidence pointing to the possibility this may actually be the lost Soviet Phobos 1 probe, and analyse various photometry and astrometry associated with 1998 KY$_{26}$ to further investigate the feasibility of this hypothesis. We find a first order approximation of the Phobos 1 spacecraft provides compelling agreement to 8 light curves of the object and further that modelling NGAs as solar radiation pressure (SRP) on a cylinder or solar panels provide significant reductions in residual of $\sim{11} \%$ with respect to the 260 astrometric and radar measurements. Although an investigation of this kind cannot be conclusive, nevertheless the results here add strong weight to the Phobos 1 hypothesis, and we find no clear contradictory evidence. The spin pole in Ecliptic J2000 coordinates, calculated from photometry based on the Phobos 1 assumption is $(λ,β)=({151^{+1}_{-2}}^{\circ},{+11^{+12}_{- 3}}^{\circ})$ , where the quoted ranges represent approximate 68.3\% confidence levels.

发表机构

  • Initiative for Interstellar Studies(星际研究倡议)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

↑