视觉装饰在双栏阅读中可能是潜在干扰
Visual Embellishments are Potential Distractions in Double-Column Reading
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究通过眼动实验探索双栏阅读中视觉装饰的影响，发现其增加扫视率并被视为干扰，但未影响理解准确率，为后续大规模研究奠定基础。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
醒目的图形，例如圆形图形标签和词级可视化，正越来越多地被直接放置在长篇文本段落中。一些研究声称，内联可视化可以帮助读者更清晰地理解数据丰富的段落。然而，阅读科学领域的研究对在文本流中引入图像提出了质疑。在这项工作中，我们对有无视觉装饰两种情况下的眼动进行了探索性研究。使用高分辨率眼动仪（EyeLink Portable Duo），我们观察到六名参与者的垂直和跨栏扫视率有较小的平均增加，但读者之间存在显著差异，且未检测到理解准确率的差异。对于数据较少的圆形字形段落，平均主观评分表明它比未装饰的对照段落更具干扰性。这些探索性观察结果与先前发现不同，并促使我们开展一项更大规模、完全交叉设计的内联图形研究。
英文摘要
Eye-catching graphics, such as circular figure labels and word-scale visualizations, are increasingly being placed directly within long-form text paragraphs. Some research has claimed that inline visualizations can help readers understand data-rich passages more clearly. However, research in the science of reading calls into question the introduction of images within the flow of text. In this work, we conduct an exploratory study of eye movement in both the presence and absence of visual embellishments. Using a high-resolution eye-tracker (EyeLink Portable Duo), we observed small mean increases in vertical and cross-column saccade rates among six participants, with substantial variation among readers and no detected difference in comprehension accuracy. Mean subjective ratings for the data-light circular-glyph passage indicated it is more distracting than its unembellished comparison passage. These exploratory observations differ from prior findings and motivate a larger, fully crossed study of inline graphics.
发表机构
- Georgia Institute of Technology（佐治亚理工学院）
- University of California, Berkeley（加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
