自我关怀与心理健康:绘制十余年人机交互干预措施图谱
Self-Care and Mental Health: Mapping Over A Decade of HCI Interventions
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究分析91篇SIGCHI论文,揭示心理健康自我关怀干预的六种取向,构建定位词汇表,强调关怀责任向用户转移,为未来设计提供参考。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
技术日益支持自我关怀,以帮助人们理解和改善自身的心理健康。人机交互(HCI)处于向自我关怀技术转变的核心位置,然而我们尚不清楚这些干预措施服务于谁、支持哪些实践、技术如何中介这些实践,以及自我关怀设计背后的假设。为了描绘当前研究格局并为未来研究提供信息,我们分析了2015年至2026年6月间ACM数字图书馆中91篇贡献心理健康自我关怀人机交互干预措施的SIGCHI论文。随后,我们进行了阐释性综合,揭示了自我关怀的六种取向,这些取向描述了人机交互自我关怀干预措施如何通过关于自我、关怀和技术的共同假设来构成关怀。总体而言,我们的工作为定位人机交互心理健康自我关怀提供了一个相互关联的词汇表,强调了关怀责任向用户的转移,并讨论了在为“普通”用户提供更具情境化的人机交互自我关怀技术说明方面的启示。
英文摘要
Technology increasingly supports self-care for understanding and improving one's own mental health. HCI is at the center of the turn towards self-care technology, yet we lack an account of who these interventions serve, what practices they support, how technology mediates those practices, and assumptions underlying design for self-care. In order to characterize the current landscape and inform future research, we analyzed 91 SIGCHI papers that contribute HCI interventions for mental health self-care from the ACM Digital Library from 2015 through June 2026. Then, we conducted an interpretive synthesis to surface six orientations of self-care, which describe how HCI self-care interventions constitute care through shared assumptions regarding self, care, and technology. Overall, our work provides an interconnected vocabulary for positioning HCI mental health self-care, highlights changing responsibilities of care towards users, and discusses implications for providing a more situated account of HCI self-care technology in addressing the 'general' user.
发表机构
- Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学)
- Cornell University(康奈尔大学)
- Columbia University(哥伦比亚大学)
机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。